Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 18, 2009, doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0b013e3181a1863c)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Volume 72, Number 23, June 9, 2009
Right arrow Korean Translation
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
01.wnl.0b013e3181a1863cv1
72/23/2014    most recent
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nahab, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nahab, F.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Received September 4, 2008
Accepted January 13, 2009

Risk factors associated with major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stenting

F. Nahab MD*, M. J. Lynn MS, S. E. Kasner MD, M. J. Alexander MD, FACS, R. Klucznik MD, O. O. Zaidat MD, J. Chaloupka MD, H. Lutsep MD, S. Barnwell MD, M. Mawad MD, B. Lane BSN, RN, M. I. Chimowitz MB, ChB, For the NIH Multicenter Wingspan Intracranial Stent Registry Study Group

From Emory University (F.N., M.J.L., B.L.), Atlanta, GA; University of Pennsylvania Medical Center (S.E.K.), Philadelphia; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.J.A.), Los Angeles, CA; Methodist Hospital (R.K.), Houston, TX; Medical College of Wisconsin/Froedtert Hospital (O.O.Z.), Milwaukee; University of Iowa (J.C.), Iowa City; Oregon Health and Science University (H.L., S.B.), Portland; Baylor College of Medicine (M.M.), Houston, TX; and Medical University of South Carolina (M.I.C.), Charleston.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fnahab{at}emory.edu.

Background: There are limited data on the relationship between patient and site characteristics and clinical outcomes after intracranial stenting.

Methods: We performed a multivariable analysis that correlated patient and site characteristics with the occurrence of the primary endpoint (any stroke or death within 30 days of stenting or stroke in the territory of the stented artery beyond 30 days) in 160 patients enrolled in this stenting registry. All patients presented with an ischemic stroke, TIA, or other cerebral ischemic event (e.g., vertebrobasilar insufficiency) in the territory of a suspected 50–99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery while on antithrombotic therapy.

Results: Cerebral angiography confirmed that 99% (158/160) of patients had a 50–99% stenosis. In multivariable analysis, the primary endpoint was associated with posterior circulation stenosis (vs anterior circulation) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–9.3, p = 0.018), stenting at low enrollment sites (<10 patients each) (vs high enrollment site) (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1–7.6, p = 0.038), ≤10 days from qualifying event to stenting (vs ≥10 days) (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0–7.8, p = 0.058), and stroke as a qualifying event (vs TIA/other) (HR 3.2, 95% CI 0.9–11.2, p = 0.064). There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint based on age, gender, race, or percent stenosis (50–69% vs 70–99%).

Conclusions: Major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stenting may be associated with posterior circulation stenosis, low volume sites, stenting soon after a qualifying event, and stroke as the qualifying event. These factors will need to be monitored in future trials of intracranial stenting.


Related Article

The learning curve for neuroendovascular procedures: How important is it?
Seemant Chaturvedi and Aaron S. Dumont
Neurology 2009 72: 1974-1975. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Kastrup and K. Groschel
Response to Letters by Trinquart and Touze and by Suh et al
Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): e590 - e590.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. Chaturvedi and A. S. Dumont
The learning curve for neuroendovascular procedures: How important is it?
Neurology, June 9, 2009; 72(23): 1974 - 1975.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.