|
|
||||||||
Department of Neurology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, LA.
The forearm segment of the ulnar nerve is difficult to assess if the nerve has been injured severely at the wrist. A new, simple nerve conduction technique of recording from the sensory dorsal branch of the nerve localizes the lesion and enables easier evaluation of that segment than do other techniques.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jabre, Department of Neurology, LSU Medical Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112.
Accepted for publication November 30, 1979.
Presented at the Sixth International Congress of Electromyography, Stockholm, Sweden, June 1979.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. R. Cowdery, D. C. Preston, D. N. Herrmann, and E. L. Logigian Electrodiagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the wrist: Conduction block versus traditional tests Neurology, August 13, 2002; 59(3): 420 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Felice and H. Royden Jones Jr Pediatric Ulnar Mononeuropathy: Report of 21 Electromyography-Documented Cases and Review of the Literature J Child Neurol, March 1, 1996; 11(2): 116 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Peterson, M. J. Giuliani, M. McHugh, and C. C. Shipe Variations in Dorsomedial Hand Innervation Electrodiagnostic Implications Arch Neurol, August 1, 1992; 49(8): 870 - 873. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-J. Kim, A. Kalantri, S. Guha, and S. F. Wainapel Dorsal Cutaneous Ulnar Nerve Conduction: Diagnostic Aid in Ulnar Neuropathy Arch Neurol, May 1, 1981; 38(5): 321 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |