Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albers, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albers, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, S. P.
NEUROLOGY 1981;31:1562
© 1981 American Academy of Neurology

Neuromuscular transmission in rheumatoid arthritis, with and without penicillamine treatment

James W. Albers, M.D., Ph.D., Carol A. Beals, M.D. and Simon P. Levine, M.S.

Electroneuromyographic Laboratory and Department of Neurology (Dr. Albersi, the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology (Dr. Bealsi, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Dr. Albers and Mr. Levine), University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Albers, Department of Neurology, B4917, C.F.O.B., Box 051, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Electroneuromyographic studies were performed on patients with rheumatoid arthritis, some of whom were receiving penicillamine, to determine whether a subclinical defect of neuromuscular transmission existed. There were no significant differences between patients and controls with respect to nerve conduction studies or repetitive ulnar nerve stimulation, Four patients (three receiving penicillamine) demonstrated mild neurogenic changes distally on needle electromyography. Mean jitter was slightly higher for patients receiving penicillamine than in other patients or controls, but the differences were not significant. No significant correlations existed between any of the studies and daily, cumulative, or average penicillamine dosage. A significant positive correlation (p <0.001) existed between jitter and duration of disease in patients receiving penicillamine. Results were consistent with the hypothesis that penicillamine predisposes certain individuals to develop myasthenia gravis rather than interfering directly with neuromuscular transmission.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.