Neurology®
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed Neurology journal
Quick Search
Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, B.
NEUROLOGY 1981;31:1070
© 1981 American Academy of Neurology

Mechanisms of confabulation

Barbara E. Shapiro, Michael P. Alexander, M.D., Howard Gardner, Ph.D. and Brian Mercer, M.D.

Aphasia Research Center and the Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, the Psychology Service (Ms Shapiro and Dr Gardner), and the Neurology Service (Dr. Alexander). Boston VA Medical Center, Boston. MA, and the Harvard Medical School II)r Mercer). and Harvard Project Zero (Dr. Gardner), Cambridge. MA.

Patients who exhibited frank confabulation were examined with four tests designed to elucidate the nature of confabulation in a structured situation, test the ability of confabulators to use cues, and examine the degree to which certain cognitive deficits are associated with confabulation. Two groups of confabulators emerged: mild and severe. Severity of confabulation was associated with perseveration, impaired self-monitoring facility, and failure to inhibit incorrect responses. Attenuation of these cognitive deficits with resolution of confabulation in a single patient suggested that the two levels of confabulation represented different levels of impairment of the same disorder.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alexander, Chief, Aphasia Neurobehavior Unit, Boston VA Medical Center, 150 S. Huntington Avenue, Boston. MA 02130.

This research was supported in part by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke. Grant Nos. NS 11408 and NS 06209, and by the Veteran's Administration.

Accepted for publication January 20, 1981.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
M. D. Kopelman
Disorders of memory
Brain, October 1, 2002; 125(10): 2152 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. Schnider, R. Ptak, C. von Daniken, and L. Remonda
Recovery from spontaneous confabulations parallels recovery of temporal confusion in memory
Neurology, July 12, 2000; 55(1): 74 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
A. Feinstein, B. Levine, and A. Protzner
Confabulation and multiple sclerosis: a rare association
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2000; 6(3): 186 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
T. E. Feinberg, D. M. Roane, P. C. Kwan, R. J. Schindler, and L. D. Haber
Anosognosia and Visuoverbal Confabulation
Arch Neurol, May 1, 1994; 51(5): 468 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
K. D. McDaniel and L. D. McDaniel
Anton's Syndrome in a Patient With Posttraumatic Optic Neuropathy and Bifrontal Contusions
Arch Neurol, January 1, 1991; 48(1): 101 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]