Neurology®
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed Neurology journal
Quick Search
Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. P.
NEUROLOGY 1984;34:1161
© 1984 American Academy of Neurology

The fate of severed corticospinal axons

Paul S. Fishman, MD, PhD and James P. Kelly, PhD

From the Departments of Neurology (Dr. Fishman) and Anatomy and Cell Biology (Dr. Kelly), College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.

The potential for regeneration of severed corticospinal axons was examined by labeling these axons with horseradish peroxidase following thoracic spinal cord transections in mice. Shortly after severance, the proximal ends of corticospinal axons formed terminal bulbs that persisted for weeks and were associated with axonal retraction. There were few signs of corticospinal axonal sprouting or elongation. By 2 months after injury, corticospinal axons near the transection site showed an increased number of probable labeled terminals in the adjacent gray matter. These new terminals may contribute to the persistence of many corticospinal axons near the injury site long after a spinal cord transection.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Fishman, Department of Neurology and the Veterans Administration Research Laboratories, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201.

Supported by NIH training grant NS07155-04 to the Department of Neurology of Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons; by an Associate Investigator Award from the Veterans Administration Research Service (P.S.F.); and by NSF grant BNS-811-0240 (J.P.K.).

Accepted for publication January 19, 1984.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. P. Horn, S. A. Busch, A. L. Hawthorne, N. van Rooijen, and J. Silver
Another Barrier to Regeneration in the CNS: Activated Macrophages Induce Extensive Retraction of Dystrophic Axons through Direct Physical Interactions
J. Neurosci., September 17, 2008; 28(38): 9330 - 9341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
T W Ford, C W Vaughan, and P A Kirkwood
Changes in the distribution of synaptic potentials from bulbospinal neurones following axotomy in cat thoracic spinal cord
J. Physiol., April 1, 2000; 524(1): 163 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
P. S. Fishman
Retrograde Changes in the Corticospinal Tract of Posttraumatic Paraplegics
Arch Neurol, October 1, 1987; 44(10): 1082 - 1084.
[Abstract] [PDF]