Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, J.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, J.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.
NEUROLOGY 1986;36:647
© 1986 American Academy of Neurology

Relation between size of compound sensory or muscle action potentials, and length of nerve segment

Jun Kimura, MD, Masafumi Machida, MD, Tetsuro Ishida, MD, Thoru Yamada, MD, Robert L. Rodnitzky, MD, Yutaka Kudo, MD and Shoji Suzuki, MD

Division of Clinical Electrophysiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Iowa City, IA.

In 24 median nerves from 12 healthy subjects, antidromic digital sensory potentials progressively diminished in size, averaging 40.4,37.0, 30.7, and 23.9 µV x msec with stimulation at the palm, wrist, elbow, and axilla, respectively. In contrast, compound muscle action potentials changed minimally, measuring 19.4, 19.8,19.0, and 18.2 mV x msec, respectively. Similar studies of the ulnar and radial nerves showed identical trends. Physiologic temporal dispersion can mimic conduction block of sensory nerves by summating the peaks of opposite polarity generated by fast- and slow-conducting axons. This type of cancellation affects muscle responses much less because motor unit potentials of longer duration superimpose nearly in phase, given the same latency shift as the sensory potentials.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kimura. Division of Clinical Electrophysiology, 0181RC P, U niversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Iowa City, IA 52242.

Presented in part at the thirty-seventh annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Dallas, TX, April 1985.

Accepted for publication September 27, 1985.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
H Koike, M Hirayama, M Yamamoto, H Ito, N Hattori, F Umehara, K Arimura, S Ikeda, Y Ando, M Nakazato, et al.
Age associated axonal features in HNPP with 17p11.2 deletion in Japan
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2005; 76(8): 1109 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Capasso, C. M. Caporale, F. Pomilio, P. Gandolfi, A. Lugaresi, and A. Uncini
Acute motor conduction block neuropathy Another Guillain-Barre syndrome variant
Neurology, September 9, 2003; 61(5): 617 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.