Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farlow, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kolar, O. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farlow, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kolar, O. J.
NEUROLOGY 1986;36:828
© 1986 American Academy of Neurology

Multiple sclerosis

Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked responses, and spinal fluid electrophoresis

Martin R. Farlow, MD, Omkar N. Markand, MD, FRCP(C), Mary K. Edwards, MD, James C. Stevens, MD and Oldrich J. Kolar, MD

Departments of Neurology (Drs. Farlow, Markand, Stevens, and Kolar) and Radiology (Dr. Edwards), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Magnetic resonance images (MRI), evoked responses (ER), and CSF findings were compared in 39 patients with possible, probable, or definite MS. MRI disclosed multiple lesions (72%) more often than ERs (55%) in the total group of patients. In possible MS, MRI showed multiple lesions in 71%, and ER abnormalities were found in 41%. MRI is the preferred test for patients with suspected MS, but ERs are useful when MRI is normal and in the evaluation of optic nerve or spinal cord lesions.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Farlow. Department of Neurology, 125 Emerson Hall, 545 Barnhill Drive, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46223.

Accepted for publication October 22, 1985.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi.Home page
W. Staffen, H. Zauner, A. Mair, A. Kutzelnigg, P. Kapeller, H. Stangl, E. Raffer, H. Niederhofer, and G. Ladurner
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Memory and Frontal Brain Region in Early Multiple Sclerosis
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, August 1, 2005; 17(3): 357 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
W. Staffen, A. Mair, H. Zauner, J. Unterrainer, H. Niederhofer, A. Kutzelnigg, S. Ritter, S. Golaszewski, B. Iglseder, and G. Ladurner
Cognitive function and fMRI in patients with multiple sclerosis: evidence for compensatory cortical activation during an attention task
Brain, June 1, 2002; 125(6): 1275 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
P. O'Connor, C. Tansey, W. Kucharczyk, A. S. Detsky, and Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group
A Randomized Trial of Test Result Sequencing in Patients With Suspected Multiple Sclerosis
Arch Neurol, January 1, 1994; 51(1): 53 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
D. W. Giang, V. M. Grow, C. Mooney, A. I. Mushlin, A. D. Goodman, D. H. Mattson, R. B. Schiffer, and Rochester-Toronto Magnetic Resonance Study Group
Clinical Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: The Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ancillary Testing
Arch Neurol, January 1, 1994; 51(1): 61 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
R. W. Baumhefner, W. W. Tourtellotte, K. Syndulko, V. Waluch, G. W. Ellison, L. W. Meyers, S. N. Cohen, M. Osborne, and P. Shapshak
Quantitative Multiple Sclerosis Plaque Assessment With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Its Correlation With Clinical Parameters, Evoked Potentials, and Intra-Blood-Brain Barrier IgG Synthesis
Arch Neurol, January 1, 1990; 47(1): 19 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
A. Pakalnis, M. E. Drake Jr, R. J. Barohn, D. W. Chakeres, and J. R. Mendell
Evoked Potentials in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy
Arch Neurol, September 1, 1988; 45(9): 1014 - 1016.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
W. A. Marks, J. B. Bodensteiner, G. B. Bobele, M. Hamza, and D. A. Wilson
Parainflammator Leukoencephalomyelitis: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings
J Child Neurol, July 1, 1988; 3(3): 205 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. L. KENT and E. B. LARSON
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine: Is Clinical Efficacy Established after the First Decade?
Ann Intern Med, March 1, 1988; 108(3): 402 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
S. J. Huber, G. W. Paulson, E. C. Shuttleworth, D. Chakeres, L. E. Clapp, A. Pakalnis, K. Weiss, and K. Rammohan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates of Dementia in Multiple Sclerosis
Arch Neurol, July 1, 1987; 44(7): 732 - 736.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
B. S. Giesser, D. Kurtzberg, H. G. Vaughan Jr, J. C. Arezzo, M. L. Aisen, C. R. Smith, N. G. LaRocca, and L. C. Scheinberg
Trimodal Evoked Potentials Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
Arch Neurol, March 1, 1987; 44(3): 281 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.