|
|
||||||||
Departments of Neurology (Drs. Farlow, Markand, Stevens, and Kolar) and Radiology (Dr. Edwards), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Magnetic resonance images (MRI), evoked responses (ER), and CSF findings were compared in 39 patients with possible, probable, or definite MS. MRI disclosed multiple lesions (72%) more often than ERs (55%) in the total group of patients. In possible MS, MRI showed multiple lesions in 71%, and ER abnormalities were found in 41%. MRI is the preferred test for patients with suspected MS, but ERs are useful when MRI is normal and in the evaluation of optic nerve or spinal cord lesions.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Farlow. Department of Neurology, 125 Emerson Hall, 545 Barnhill Drive, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46223.
Accepted for publication October 22, 1985.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Staffen, H. Zauner, A. Mair, A. Kutzelnigg, P. Kapeller, H. Stangl, E. Raffer, H. Niederhofer, and G. Ladurner Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Memory and Frontal Brain Region in Early Multiple Sclerosis J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, August 1, 2005; 17(3): 357 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Staffen, A. Mair, H. Zauner, J. Unterrainer, H. Niederhofer, A. Kutzelnigg, S. Ritter, S. Golaszewski, B. Iglseder, and G. Ladurner Cognitive function and fMRI in patients with multiple sclerosis: evidence for compensatory cortical activation during an attention task Brain, June 1, 2002; 125(6): 1275 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. O'Connor, C. Tansey, W. Kucharczyk, A. S. Detsky, and Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group A Randomized Trial of Test Result Sequencing in Patients With Suspected Multiple Sclerosis Arch Neurol, January 1, 1994; 51(1): 53 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Giang, V. M. Grow, C. Mooney, A. I. Mushlin, A. D. Goodman, D. H. Mattson, R. B. Schiffer, and Rochester-Toronto Magnetic Resonance Study Group Clinical Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: The Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ancillary Testing Arch Neurol, January 1, 1994; 51(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Baumhefner, W. W. Tourtellotte, K. Syndulko, V. Waluch, G. W. Ellison, L. W. Meyers, S. N. Cohen, M. Osborne, and P. Shapshak Quantitative Multiple Sclerosis Plaque Assessment With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Its Correlation With Clinical Parameters, Evoked Potentials, and Intra-Blood-Brain Barrier IgG Synthesis Arch Neurol, January 1, 1990; 47(1): 19 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pakalnis, M. E. Drake Jr, R. J. Barohn, D. W. Chakeres, and J. R. Mendell Evoked Potentials in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Arch Neurol, September 1, 1988; 45(9): 1014 - 1016. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Marks, J. B. Bodensteiner, G. B. Bobele, M. Hamza, and D. A. Wilson Parainflammator Leukoencephalomyelitis: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings J Child Neurol, July 1, 1988; 3(3): 205 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. KENT and E. B. LARSON Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine: Is Clinical Efficacy Established after the First Decade? Ann Intern Med, March 1, 1988; 108(3): 402 - 424. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Huber, G. W. Paulson, E. C. Shuttleworth, D. Chakeres, L. E. Clapp, A. Pakalnis, K. Weiss, and K. Rammohan Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates of Dementia in Multiple Sclerosis Arch Neurol, July 1, 1987; 44(7): 732 - 736. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Giesser, D. Kurtzberg, H. G. Vaughan Jr, J. C. Arezzo, M. L. Aisen, C. R. Smith, N. G. LaRocca, and L. C. Scheinberg Trimodal Evoked Potentials Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis Arch Neurol, March 1, 1987; 44(3): 281 - 284. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |