Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorance, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mao, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorance, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mao, C.
NEUROLOGY 1987;37:923
© 1987 American Academy of Neurology

Contrast visual testing in neurovisual diagnosis

Robert W. Lorance, MD, David Kaufman, DO, Shirley H. Wray, MD, PhD, FRCP and Charlotte Mao, BS

Department of Neurology (Dr. Lorance), Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, Maywood, IL; the Neurovisual Unit, Department of Internal Medicine (Dr. Kaufman), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI; and the Unit for Neurovisual Disorders (Dr. Wray and Ms. Mao), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Contrast visual testing (CVT) is a psychophysical visual test of undetermined diagnostic capability in many neurovisual disorders. CVT of 32 controls and 39 patients was compared with the pattern visual evoked response (PVER) from each group. CVT was more sensitive than PVER in detecting visual dysfunction in pseudotumor cerebri and subclinical optic neuritis and showed potential in distinguishing papilledema from pseudopapilledema. PVER was more sensitive than CVT in detecting subclinical visual dysfunction in MS and optic nerve compression. Neither was abnormal in asymptomatic Leber's optic neuropathy. In nonorganic visual loss, CVT data were variable and inconsistent, supporting this diagnosis; PVER was consistently normal. Although in certain disease conditions, each detected subclinical visual dysfunction, neither CVT nor PVER provided specific information leading to an etiologic diagnosis.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Lorance, Department of Neurology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153.

Received June 26, 1986. Accepted for publication in final form September 5, 1986.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
J. T. Hutton, J. L. Morris, and J. W. Elias
Levodopa Improves Spatial Contrast Sensitivity in Parkinson's Disease
Arch Neurol, July 1, 1993; 50(7): 721 - 724.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.