Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pestronk, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cornblath, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pestronk, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cornblath, D. R.
NEUROLOGY 1989;39:628
© 1989 American Academy of Neurology

Differential effects of prednisone and cyclophosphamide on autoantibodies in human neuromuscular disorders

A. Pestronk, MD, R. N. Adams, MSc, R. W. Kuncl, MD, PhD, D. B. Drachman, MD, L. L. Clawson, RN and D. R. Cornblath, MD

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

We compared the effects of treatment of patients with prednisone or cyclophosphamide on a series of different types of autoantibodies. Levels of antiacetylcholine receptor (anti-AChR) antibodies and of antibodies to GM, and GD,, gangliosides were measured in patients with a variety of neuromuscular disorders before and after treatment. Most patients had several autoantibodies present. We showed that prednisone treatment resulted in a reduction in titers of anti-AChR but not angantiglioside antibodies. Cyclophosphamide treatment produced a reduction of antiganglioside antibody titers. An intravenous and oral regimen was more effective than a single intravenous course of cyclophosphamide. We conclude that an immunosuppressive medication such as prednisone may reduce levels of some autoantibodies while producing no change in others, even in an individual patient. In addition, cyclophosphamide can suppress autoantibodies that prednisone does not. These differences in immunopharmacologic responses suggest that there are several distinct mechanisms of autoantibody production in humans. The utility of immunosuppressive medications in specific disease processes may be related in part to the mechanism of production of pathogenic antibodies.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Pestronk, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Steet, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Supported by grants P01NS 22849, lR0l NS23719, lR0l NS26616. and lR0l AGO7438 from the NIH, the Jay Slotkin Fund for Neuromuscular Research, the MND Fund, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and the ALS Association.

Received August 31, 1988. Accepted for publication in final form November 10,1988.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
S. Piepers, R. Van den Berg-Vos, W-L. Van der Pol, H. Franssen, J. Wokke, and L. Van den Berg
Mycophenolate mofetil as adjunctive therapy for MMN patients: a randomized, controlled trial
Brain, August 1, 2007; 130(8): 2004 - 2010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.