Neurology®
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed Neurology journal
Quick Search
Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pettier-Jennings, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pettier-Jennings, P.
NEUROLOGY 1989;39:1018
© 1989 American Academy of Neurology

A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-masked, variable dosage, clinical trial of azathioprine with and without methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis

G. W. Ellison, MD, L. W. Myers, MD, M. R. Mickey, PhD, M. C. Graves, MD, W. W. Tourtellotte, MD, PhD, K. Syndulko, PhD, M. I. Holevoet-Howson, RN, C. D. Lerner, RN, M. V. Frane, MA and P. Pettier-Jennings, BS

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA (Drs. Ellison, Graves, Myers, Syndulko, and Tourtellotte; Mss. Holevoet-Howson, Lerner, and Frane)
Department of Biomathematics, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA (Dr. Mickey)
Neurology Service, VAMC Wadsworth, Los Angeles, CA (Drs. Syndulko and Tourtellotte; Ms. Pettier-Jennings).

Ninety-eight patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in the chronic progression phase entered a 3-year clinical trial to determine if azathioprine (AZ) alone or with adrenal cortical steroids stabilizes the course of MS. In group AM, the patients took AZ throughout and methylprednisolone (MP) for the first 36 weeks. Group AP received AZ and placebo instead of MP. Group PP took placebos for both drugs. We adjusted the AZ to maintain the total white blood cell count within 3,000 to 4,000/mm3; we gave the MP in a fixed dose "pulse" and alternate-day regimen. The "intent-to-treat" groups had no statistically significant differences in the rates of progression among the 3 treatments. Subgroup analysis suggests that patients in the AM group who completed treatment exactly according to protocol did statistically significantly better than the placebo recipients using the sum of Standard Neurological Examination scores, slightly better using the quantitative neuro-performance tests, but no better using Mickey's Illness Severity Scores or Kurtzke's Disability Status Scale. Also, the AZ-treated groups had half the relapse rate of the placebo-treated group. Adverse reactions to AZ accounted for most withdrawals. Hematologic and hepatic abnormalities were significantly associated with AZ, but serious non-MS abnormalities were uncommon and were equally distributed among the 3 groups. Addition of MP to the AZ slightly improved the efficacy of the treatment, but also increased the adverse effects. The benefits of AZ with or without steroids did not outweigh the risks, and therefore we do not recommend this treatment for patients with chronic progressive MS.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ellison, Reed Neurological Research Center UCLA, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90024–1769.

Supported by USPHS grants NS-16776 and NS-08711 and grants from the Gustafson Estate and Joe Gheen Barbecue Fund, Department of Neurology, UCLA.

Presented in part at the thirty-eighth annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, New Orleans, LA, April 1986.

Received December 7, 1988. Accepted for publication in final form March 9, 1989.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
C. Lebrun, M. Debouverie, P. Vermersch, P. Clavelou, L. Rumbach, J. de Seze, S. Wiertlevski, G. Defer, O. Gout, F. Berthier, et al.
Cancer risk and impact of disease-modifying treatments in patients with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2008; 14(3): 399 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. A. Rizvi and K. Bashir
Other therapy options and future strategies for treating patients with multiple sclerosis
Neurology, December 28, 2004; 63(12_suppl_6): S47 - S54.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. L M Sudlow and C. E Counsell
Problems with UK government's risk sharing scheme for assessing drugs for multiple sclerosis
BMJ, February 15, 2003; 326(7385): 388 - 392.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
J S Fischer, R A Rudick, G R Cutter, S C Reingold, and National MS Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment T
The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 1999; 5(4): 244 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
A M Rostami, R A Sater, S J Bird, S Galetta, R E Farber, M Kamoun, D H Silberberg, R I Grossman, and D Pfohl
A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of extracorporeal photopheresis in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 1999; 5(3): 198 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
G. R. Cutter, M. L. Baier, R. A. Rudick, D. L. Cookfair, J. S. Fischer, J. Petkau, K. Syndulko, B. G. Weinshenker, J. P. Antel, C. Confavreux, et al.
Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure
Brain, May 1, 1999; 122(5): 871 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. A. Rudick, J. A. Cohen, B. Weinstock-Guttman, R. P. Kinkel, and R. M. Ransohoff
Management of Multiple Sclerosis
N. Engl. J. Med., November 27, 1997; 337(22): 1604 - 1611.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
K. Syndulko, D. Ke, G. W Ellison, R. W Baumhefner, L. W Myers, and W. W Tourtellotte
Comparative evaluations of neuroperformance and clinical outcome assessments in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: I. reliability, validity and sensitivity to disease progression
Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 1996; 2(3): 142 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
H. S Panitch
Investigational drug therapies for treatment of multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 1996; 2(2): 66 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
C Confavreux and T Moreau
Emerging treatments in multiple sclerosis: Azathioprine and Mof etil
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 1996; 1(6): 379 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
L. Kappos
Combinations of drugs
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 1996; 1(6): 400 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]