Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nuessen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, E. B., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Nuessen, J.
NEUROLOGY 1991;41:1469
© 1991 American Academy of Neurology

Motor initiation versus execution in normal and Parkinson's disease subjects

Erwin B. Montgomery, Jr., MD, Douglas S. Gorman, AB and Julie Nuessen, MHS, PT

Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery (Neurology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

We studied motor initiation and execution using wrist extension movements to changing target locations in eight normal subjects and nine Parkinson's disease (PD) patients before and after medications. Late changes resulted in double trajectories, indicating commitment to the initial target acquisition program followed by a correcting movement. There was compensation for earlier changes, even after onset of agonist muscle activity, resulting in a single trajectory, implying that the original trajectory had not yet been specified. However, movements were slowed in PD patients implying an abnormality in the content of the target acquisition program but not in the timing of its specification. In PD patients, the timing of the second movement onset correlated best with the timing of target location change and did not depend on initial movement completion. Thus, PD patients were able to program the second movement while the first movement was under way.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Erwin B. Montgomery, Jr., Department of Neurology, The University of Arizona, Arizona Health Sciences Center, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724.

Received August 8, 1990. Accepted for publication in final form February 14, 1991.

Supported by a grant from the American Parkinson Disease Association and its greater St. Louis Chapter and the Jane K. Pelton Fund for Movement Disorders Research.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. B. Baker and E. B. Montgomery Jr.
Performance on the PD test battery by relatives of patients with progressive supranuclear palsy
Neurology, January 9, 2001; 56(1): 25 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M. Plotnik, T. Flash, R. Inzelberg, E. Schechtman, and A. D Korczyn
Motor switching abilities in Parkinson's disease and old age: temporal aspects
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 1998; 65(3): 328 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.