Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glendinning, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vierck, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glendinning, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vierck, C. J., Jr
NEUROLOGY 1993;43:363
© 1993 American Academy of Neurology

Lack of a proprioceptive deficit after dorsal column lesions in monkeys

D. S. Glendinning, PhD and C. J. Vierck, Jr, PhD

Department of Neuroscience and Center for Neurobiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Previous psychophysical examinations of the effects of dorsal column (DC) lesions on proprioception of the lower extremity have not revealed disturbances in proprioception, and there have been no similar experiments for the upper extremity. To evaluate the effect of DC lesions on upper extremity proprioception, we tested two monkeys with a variation of the typical clinical test for position sense. This test required the monkeys to detect the direction of a passive displacement of the finger. We identified proprioceptive deficits in one monkey following a DC lesion, but only when the finger was displaced with a small (<14°), slow (<7°/sec) movement. When we included displacements of all sizes and velocities in the analysis, performance was unaffected by the DC lesions in either monkey. Since the standard test for proprioception does not specify the speed and size of movements, we conclude that this test is not a valid method for estimating damage to the DCs.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Diana Glendinning, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Gittings Building, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.

Supported by NIMH grant F31MH09734 and NIH grant NS07261.

Received April 22, 1992. Accepted for publication in final form July 14, 1992.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S Gilman
Joint position sense and vibration sense: anatomical organisation and assessment
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2002; 73(5): 473 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Cerrato, D. Imperiale, M. Bergui, M. Giraudo, C. Baima, M. Grasso, L. Lopiano, and B. Bergamasco
Restricted Dissociated Sensory Loss in a Patient With a Lateral Medullary Syndrome : A Clinical-MRI Study
Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31(12): 3064 - 3066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. E. McKenna and I. Q. Whishaw
Complete Compensation in Skilled Reaching Success with Associated Impairments in Limb Synergies, after Dorsal Column Lesion in the Rat
J. Neurosci., March 1, 1999; 19(5): 1885 - 1894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.