Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. L.
NEUROLOGY 1993;43:801
© 1993 American Academy of Neurology

Altered brain development in Turner's syndrome

An event-related potential study

Ray Johnson, Jr., PhD, John W. Rohrbaugh, PhD and Judith L. Ross, MD

Cognitive Neurophysiology Unit (Dr. Johnson), Cognitive Neuroscience Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; the Department of Psychiatry (Dr. Rohrbaugh), Washington University, St. Louis, MO; and the Department of Pediatrics (Dr. Ross), The Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

We compared event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and reaction time (RT) measures from untreated young (prepubertal and peripubertal; ages 9 to 14) and old (postpubertal; ages 15 to 20) Turner's syndrome (TS) subjects with those from normal age-matched controls. Comparisons among groups permitted the assessment of the relative roles of congenital and maturational brain alterations as possible bases of the cognitive deficits in TS. All subjects were presented with series of auditory stimuli, and they either counted one of the two stimuli or made rapid discriminative button presses to both. The results indicated that, whereas the ERPs in young TS females were essentially the same as those in their age-matched controls, the ERPs in old TS females more closely resembled those in both young groups than those in their age-matched controls. Specifically, a late (400 to 900 msec) frontal negative slow wave (Nc) in the old TS subjects failed to show the normal maturational course in which the amplitude and duration of this component steadily decreases with age. Except for slightly greater amounts of N1 amplitude in the young TS group, the latencies, amplitudes, and scalp distributions of the other ERP components (N1, P2, N2, P300) were all the same at all ages in the TS subjects and their controls. Behaviorally, both TS groups had longer RTs than their controls but, consistent with the ERP results, they did not make more errors. The ERP and RT results point to the existence of two kinds of abnormalities in TS females, each from a different mechanism: the ERP results suggest an age-dependent maturational defect while the RT results suggest an age-independent congenital defect.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ray Johnson, Jr., Cognitive Neurophysiology Unit, CNS, MNB, NINDS, The National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 5S209, Bethesda, MD 20892.

Received April 30, 1992. Accepted for publication in final form August 4, 1992.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. L. Ross, D. Roeltgen, G. A. Stefanatos, P. Feuillan, H. Kushner, C. Bondy, and G. B. Cutler Jr.
Androgen-Responsive Aspects of Cognition in Girls with Turner Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 292 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.