Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. J., Jr.
NEUROLOGY 1993;43:1304
© 1993 American Academy of Neurology

Polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Further evidence that IgM-MGUS neuropathies are different than IgG-MGUS

Guillermo A. Suarez, MD and John J. Kelly, Jr., MD

Department of Neurology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA.

We evaluated the clinical characteristics and electromyographic features of 39 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and neuropathy. Twenty-three patients had a monoclonal IgM protein, 13 had an IgG, and three had an IgA. In 15 patients of the IgM group, the M protein reacted with myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG). Comparing IgM-MGUS and IgG-MGUS neuropathies, we found the following differences: (1) There was a statistically significant higher frequency of sensory loss in the IgM group. (2) Nine attributes of nerve conduction abnormality were statistically worse in the IgM group, with slowing of conduction velocities and prolonged distal latencies. (3) The frequency of monoclonal IgM was overrepresented in the MGUS neuropathy group. In general, the clinical and electrophysiologic features of the IgM-MGUS MAG-reactive group were not significantly different than the MAG-nonreactive group. Our cases are similar to those previously reported and suggest that monoclonal IgM-MGUS should be separated conceptually from monoclonal IgG neuropathies.

Presented in part at the 44th annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, San Diego, CA, May 1992.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Guillermo A. Suarez, Mayo Clinic, Peripheral Nerve Center, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Supported in part by a grant from the Muscular Dystrophy Association.

Received August 28,1992. Accepted for publication in final form November 12, 1992.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
I. S. J. Merkies, P. I. M. Schmitz, F. G. A. van der Meche, and P. A. van Doorn
Psychometric evaluation of a new sensory scale in immune-mediated polyneuropathies
Neurology, February 22, 2000; 54(4): 943 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. S. Katz, D. S. Saperstein, G. Gronseth, A. A. Amato, and R. J. Barohn
Distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy
Neurology, February 8, 2000; 54(3): 615 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. H. Ropper and K. C. Gorson
Neuropathies Associated with Paraproteinemia
N. Engl. J. Med., May 28, 1998; 338(22): 1601 - 1607.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
K. C Gorson and A. H Ropper
Axonal neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 1997; 63(2): 163 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.