Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barton, J. J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barton, J. J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzo, M.
NEUROLOGY 1994;44:273
© 1994 American Academy of Neurology

Motion perception in optic neuropathy

Jason J.S. Barton, MD, FRCPC and Matthew Rizzo, MD

Departments of Ophthalmology (Dr. Barton) and Neurology (Dr. Rizzo), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA was supported by NIH PO NS 19632.

We tested motion perception in 15 eyes of 13 patients with optic neuropathy. Eleven of the eyes had optic neuritis. The motion perception paradigm tested subjects' ability to discriminate the direction of a global coherent motion signal amid varying levels of background noise. The results showed defective motion processing in eight of the 15 eyes. This defect was not due to low visibility (poor spatial resolution), since 11 of the 15 eyes had Snellen acuities of 20/20 or better. Neither was impaired motion perception due to decreased luminance sensitivity, since attenuating the display signal by 2.1 log units (0.6 units more than the worst relative afferent pupillary defect in any patient) in five normal eyes had no effect. Motion perception and critical flicker fusion were independent of each other. Given proposals that both depend exclusively on the same M, or transient, channel, we had not predicted this double dissociation between flicker and motion perception.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jason J.S. Barton, Department of Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 2S8.

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the North American Neuro-ophthalmologic Society, Park City, UT, February 1991.

Received April 1, 1993. Accepted for publication in final form July 28, 1993.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S Rinalduzzi, A Brusa, and S J Jones
Variation of visual evoked potential delay to stimulation of central, nasal, and temporal regions of the macula in optic neuritis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2001; 70(1): 28 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.