Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trick, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trick, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, M.
NEUROLOGY 1995;45:68-74
© 1995 American Academy of Neurology

Visual field loss in senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type

Gary L. Trick, PhD, Linda R. Trick, OD, Patricia Morris and Mitchell Wolf, MD

Article abstract-Background: Visual performance is impaired in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type (SDAT). We investigated the visual field topography of these deficits. Methods: Humphrey automated perimetry (Program 30-2) was used to measure differential luminance sensitivity within the central 60 degrees of the visual field in SDAT patients (n = 61) and in visually and cognitively normal volunteer subjects of similar age (n = 61). Twenty-three SDAT patients were retested 18 months after the original examination. Results: Reliable visual fields (by manufacturer's criteria) were obtained in 72.1% (44/61) of the control subjects and 55.7% (34/61) of the SDAT group. In the SDAT group, differential luminance sensitivity was significantly reduced relative to the control group. Visual sensitivity was reduced throughout the visual field, but deficits were most pronounced in the inferior visual field, where they presented most commonly as arcuate defects. Patients with more severe dementia exhibited greater reductions in visual sensitivity. On follow-up, 14 of 23 SDAT patients exhibited progression of visual field loss, whereas only two of 23 patients exhibited a regression of the visual field loss. Conclusions: Although automated perimetry requires considerable patient cooperation, many patients with SDAT can produce reliable visual field results. These patients exhibit significant reductions in global sensitivity. Visual field loss in SDAT is most pronounced in the inferonasal and inferotemporal arcuate regions of the visual field but also involves the central field.

NEUROLOGY 1995;45: 68-74




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
F. Berisha, G. T. Feke, C. L. Trempe, J. W. McMeel, and C. L. Schepens
Retinal Abnormalities in Early Alzheimer's Disease
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 2285 - 2289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
P. A. Sample, D. J. Plummer, A. J. Mueller, K. I. Matsubara, A. Sadun, I. Grant, and W. R. Freeman
Pattern of Early Visual Field Loss in HIV-Infected Patients
Arch Ophthalmol, June 1, 1999; 117(6): 755 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
K. Bashir, R. J. Elble, M. Ghobrial, and R. G. Struble
Hemianopsia in Dementia With Lewy Bodies
Arch Neurol, August 1, 1998; 55(8): 1132 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.