Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thyagarajan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Harms, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thyagarajan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Harms, G.
NEUROLOGY 1995;45:421-427
© 1995 American Academy of Neurology

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Brachial Plexopathy of Cancer

Dominic Thyagarajan, MD, FRACP, Terrence Cascino, MD and Gordon Harms, MD

Article abstract-We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of all patients with cancer and brachial plexopathy who had an MRI of the brachial plexus between 1984 and 1993 (71 patients). The MRIs were reevaluated in a blinded fashion. The presence of a mass adjacent to the brachial plexus on MRI was highly predictive of tumor infiltration as determined by clinicopathologic criteria and was the most useful feature in distinguishing radiation plexopathy from tumor infiltration. Increased T2 signal in or near the brachial plexus was commonly seen in both groups and was not useful in this distinction. MRI was very sensitive for brachial plexus abnormalities in this condition, and limited comparison with CT suggested that MRI is superior to CT as an imaging modality. CT performed sufficiently well, however, to suggest that a prospective comparison study of the cost effectiveness and clinical utility of the two imaging modalities in this clinical setting is warranted.

NEUROLOGY 1995;45: 421-427




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
B.C. Bowen, D.J. Seidenwurm, and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging
Plexopathy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 400 - 402.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D.M. Yousem, K. Gad, and R.P. Tufano
Resectability Issues with Head and Neck Cancer
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2006; 27(10): 2024 - 2036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. H. Wittenberg and M. C. Adkins
MR Imaging of Nontraumatic Brachial Plexopathies: Frequency and Spectrum of Findings
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2000; 20(4): 1023 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.