HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alexandrov, A. V. Articles by Norris, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alexandrov, A. V. Articles by Norris, J. W.

Do-not-resuscitate orders in acute stroke

Article abstract-Although the general guidelines for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders apply to acute stroke patients, few data are available to aid decision-making. With a view to developing specific guidelines for use in patients with acute stroke, we decided to evaluate the clinical factors associated with DNR orders at our university teaching hospital. We prospectively studied 450 consecutive patients with acute hemispheric strokes (237 men and 213 women, mean age 75 +-\12 years). Thirty-six patients (8%) had intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and 414 (92%) had ischemic strokes. Overall inhospital mortality was 26%. DNR status was given to 31% of all patients at some time during their admission (83% of those died). DNR decision-making was closely associated with the severity of the neurologic deficit (Canadian Neurological Scale score <=5); the patient's incapacity for informed DNR decision-making; age (>60 years); and devastating ICH unsuitable for surgery (p < 0.001). Fifty-three percent of DNR orders were given on admission (first 24 hours of the hospital stay), 35% during the first week of the hospital stay, due to brain damage, and 12% at any time between days 8 and 44 due to systemic complications. Once DNR status was given, 53% of patients continued to receive normal nutrition and 60% still received medical or surgical treatment. Although the current practice of DNR orders in patients with acute stroke is generally satisfactory, some criteria (eg, age and operable ICH) need revision. Following the decision to withhold CPR, patients with severe stroke, irreversible brain damage, and/or significant comorbidities should receive DNR status whenever the prognosis has become clear for physicians and family. We suggest provisional disease-specific criteria for DNR decision-making in acute stroke.

NEUROLOGY 1995;45: 634-640

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Zia, G. Engstrom, P. J. Svensson, B. Norrving, and H. Pessah-Rasmussen Three-Year Survival and Stroke Recurrence Rates in Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3567 - 3573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Broderick, S. Connolly, E. Feldmann, D. Hanley, C. Kase, D. Krieger, M. Mayberg, L. Morgenstern, C. S. Ogilvy, P. Vespa, et al. REPRINT: Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Adults: 2007 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): e391 - e413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Broderick, S. Connolly, E. Feldmann, D. Hanley, C. Kase, D. Krieger, M. Mayberg, L. Morgenstern, C. S. Ogilvy, P. Vespa, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Adults: 2007 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 2001 - 2023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Zahuranec, D. L. Brown, L. D. Lisabeth, N. R. Gonzales, P. J. Longwell, M. A. Smith, N. M. Garcia, and L. B. Morgenstern Early care limitations independently predict mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage Neurology, May 15, 2007; 68(20): 1651 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Onukwugha and C. D. Mullins Racial Differences in Hospital Discharge Disposition among Stroke Patients in Maryland Med Decis Making, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 233 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. Brown, F. Al-Senani, L. D. Lisabeth, M. A. Farnie, L. A. Colletti, K. M. Langa, A. M. Fendrick, N. M. Garcia, M. A. Smith, and L. B. Morgenstern Defining Cause of Death in Stroke Patients: The Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi Project Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2007; 165(5): 591 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Mohammed, J. Mant, L. Bentham, A. Stevens, and S. Hussain Process of care and mortality of stroke patients with and without a do not resuscitate order in the West Midlands, UK Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 102 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Jackson, J. L. Yarzebski, R. J. Goldberg, B. Wheeler, J. H. Gurwitz, D. M. Lessard, S. E. Bedell, and J. M. Gore Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Worcester Heart Attack Study Arch Intern Med, April 12, 2004; 164(7): 776 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. B. Shepardson, S. J. Youngner, T. Speroff, R. G. O'Brien, K. A. Smyth, and G. E. Rosenthal Variation in the Use of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Patients With Stroke Arch Intern Med, September 8, 1997; 157(16): 1841 - 1847. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. V. Alexandrov, P. M. Pullicino, E. M. Meslin, and J. W. Norris Agreement on Disease-Specific Criteria for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Acute Stroke Stroke, February 1, 1996; 27(2): 232 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text]