Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, R.

Neurology, Vol 45, Issue 6 1205-1210, Copyright © 1995 by American Academy of Neurology


ARTICLES

Frontal lobe neglect in monkeys

KM Heilman, E Valenstein, A Day and R Watson
Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.

Using a crossed-response task, monkeys with neglect induced by frontal lesions appear to have motor rather than sensory neglect. However, the crossed-response task may not reveal sensory neglect (inattention) if no perceptual discrimination is required. We therefore trained two monkeys in a perceptually complex crossed-response task. Following unilateral frontal (arcuate gyrus) ablation, we found no contralateral perceptual disorders or sensory neglect in either monkey but did find a failure to respond with the contralateral arm (motor neglect) in both monkeys. We also found that the monkeys made more incorrect responses with the arm ipsilateral to the lesion than they did with the contralateral arm. The errors made by the ipsilateral arm could be a compensatory strategy or a disinhibition phenomenon. Because these incorrect responses were not rewarded and became more frequent as motor neglect improved, the incorrect responses of the ipsilateral arm are not a compensatory strategy, but rather a defect we term "disinhibition hyperkinesia" or "allokinesia."


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
T. Hodgson, M. Chamberlain, B. Parris, M. James, N. Gutowski, M. Husain, and C. Kennard
The role of the ventrolateral frontal cortex in inhibitory oculomotor control
Brain, June 1, 2007; 130(6): 1525 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
B. R. Payne and R. J. Rushmore
Animal Models of Cerebral Neglect and Its Cancellation
Neuroscientist, December 1, 2003; 9(6): 446 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.