|
|
||||||||
From the Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development (Dr. Fillenbaum, and M.S. Huber), Duke University, Durham, NC; Department of Environmental Health (D. Beekly), University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Neurology (Dr. Henderson), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (Dr. Mortimer), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN; Departments of Neurology and Pathology (Neuropathology) (Dr. Morris), Washington University, St. Louis, MO; and Department of Neurology (Dr. Harrell), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Supported in part by NIA grant no. AG06790.
Received March 7, 1995. Accepted in final form May 20, 1995.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gerda G. Fillenbaum, Box 3003, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Article abstract-Although autopsy rates in the United States have been decreasing steadily, the necessity for brain autopsy to confirm Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains. Of 308 consecutively deceased AD patients at 24 CERAD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) sites, 167 (54%) were autopsied; 141 (46%) were not. The autopsied and nonautopsied groups were comparable in gender (men, 57.5% versus 49.7%), marital status (married, 69.3% versus 67.1%), age at entry (73 versus 74 years), age at death (76 versus 77 years), and stage of disease at entry (mild, 46% versus 43%). However, the autopsied patients were significantly more likely to be white (94.5% versus 82.1%), to be better educated (13.1 versus 11.3 years), to have been in the study longer (mean, 3.3 versus 2.6 years), and to have had longer total duration of AD (8.1 versus 6.7 years). Of the 24 CERAD sites, 13 stressed the importance of autopsy by dedicating a staff member to seek autopsy and by providing free autopsy and transportation; 11 did not. Logistic regression analysis showed that white race (odds ratio [OR] = 2.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-6.83), increased education (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.04-1.21), and emphasis on autopsy (OR = 4.69; 95% CI = 2.67-8.25) were the only significant factors. Although race and education were important, autopsy was more likely to be obtained when sites dedicated resources to this endeavor.
NEUROLOGY 1996;46: 142-145
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Petrovitch, L.R. White, G.W. Ross, S.C. Steinhorn, C.Y. Li, K.H. Masaki, D.G. Davis, J. Nelson, J. Hardman, J.D. Curb, et al. Accuracy of clinical criteria for AD in the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study, a population-based study Neurology, July 24, 2001; 57(2): 226 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Massoud, G. Devi, Y. Stern, A. Lawton, J. E. Goldman, Y. Liu, S. S. Chin, and R. Mayeux A Clinicopathological Comparison of Community-Based and Clinic-Based Cohorts of Patients With Dementia Arch Neurol, November 1, 1999; 56(11): 1368 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Fillenbaum, B. Peterson, K. A. Welsh-Bohmer, W. A. Kukull, and A. Heyman Progression of Alzheimer's disease in black and white patients: The CERAD experience, Part XVI Neurology, July 1, 1998; 51(1): 154 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |