Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollack, I. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvihill, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pollack, I. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvihill, J. J.
NEUROLOGY 1996;46:1652-1660
© 1996 American Academy of Neurology

The management of brainstem gliomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 1

Ian F. Pollack, MD, Barbara Shultz, BS and John J. Mulvihill, MD

From the Department of Neurosurgery (Dr. Pollack and B. Shultz), Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and the Department of Human Genetics (Dr. Mulvihill), University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA.
Supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (K08-NS01810), The Copeland Foundation, and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh to Dr. Pollack.
Received August 4, 1995. Accepted in final form October 10, 1995.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ian F. Pollack, Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3705 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

The appropriate management of brainstem tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) has been problematic because the natural history of these lesions remains poorly defined.To formulate rational guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of these tumors, we reviewed the outcome of 21 patients with brainstem mass lesions followed in our NF clinic during the last 9 years. We subdivided the imaging features of these lesions into four groups: (1) diffuse enlargement of the brainstem with hypointensity on T1-weighted MR images and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images (n = 9); (2) focal enhancing masses (n = 7); (3) intrinsic tectal tumors (n = 5); and (4) focal nonenhancing areas of hypointensity on T1-weighted MR images (n = 2). Two cases exhibited two types of lesions. Twelve patients presented with, or developed, symptoms that were referable to the mass; in nine, the lesion was asymptomatic. A distinguishing feature of these tumors was their generally indolent biological behavior. With a median follow-up of 3.75 years, only 10 patients have had radiographic (n = 9) or clinical (n = 3) evidence of disease progression. In seven of these patients, the tumor subsequently stabilized in size or regressed without intervention. Only four patients, each with a focal enhancing tumor, received specific therapy for the tumor; this consisted of biopsy (n = 1), excision (n = 3), and adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 2). Each of these lesions was a low-grade glioma histologically and each remained stable in size after treatment (median follow-up = 4.25 years). Four patients with tectal tumors underwent insertion of a CSF shunt for hydrocephalus, but required no specific treatment for the tumor. None of the patients with diffuse brainstem lesions or focal areas of hypointensity required any intervention for the tumor. All 21 patients are presently alive and well.

We conclude that the biological behavior of brainstem lesions in patients with NF1 differs significantly from that of lesions with a similar appearance in patients without this disorder.Although these lesions may at some time in their course exhibit clinical and radiographic progression, most do not require specific intervention. The lesions that are most likely to progress and require therapy are focal enhancing tumors; however, even lesions in this subgroup may stabilize in size or regress spontaneously without intervention. Based on these results, we recommend that intervention be limited to those lesions that exhibit rapid or unrelenting growth on serial images or that produce significant clinical deterioration.

NEUROLOGY 1996;46: 1652-1660




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
F. W. Floeth, M. Sabel, G. Stoffels, D. Pauleit, K. Hamacher, H.-J. Steiger, and K.-J. Langen
Prognostic Value of 18F-Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine PET and MRI in Small Nonspecific Incidental Brain Lesions
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 730 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. R. Leonard, A. Perry, J. B. Rubin, A. A. King, M. R. Chicoine, and D. H. Gutmann
The role of surgical biopsy in the diagnosis of glioma in individuals with neurofibromatosis-1
Neurology, October 24, 2006; 67(8): 1509 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. S. Donaldson, F. Laningham, and P. G. Fisher
Advances Toward an Understanding of Brainstem Gliomas
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2006; 24(8): 1266 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
D. H. Gutmann
Review Article : Neurofibromin in the Brain
J Child Neurol, August 1, 2002; 17(8): 592 - 601.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
T. Rosser and R. J. Packer
Review Article : Intracranial Neoplasms in Children With Neurofibromatosis 1
J Child Neurol, August 1, 2002; 17(8): 630 - 637.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Gururangan, C. M. Cavazos, D. Ashley, J. E. Herndon II, C. S. Bruggers, A. Moghrabi, D. L. Scarcella, M. Watral, S. Tourt-Uhlig, D. Reardon, et al.
Phase II Study of Carboplatin in Children With Progressive Low-Grade Gliomas
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2002; 20(13): 2951 - 2958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J.-S. Guillamo, A. Creange, C. Kalifa, J. Grill, D. Rodriguez, F. Doz, S. Barbarot, M. Zerah, M. Sanson, S. Bastuji-Garin, et al.
Prognostic factors of CNS tumours in Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1): A retrospective study of 104 patients
Brain, January 1, 2002; 126(1): 152 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J.-S. Guillamo, A. Monjour, L. Taillandier, B. Devaux, P. Varlet, C. Haie-Meder, G.-L. Defer, P. Maison, J.-J. Mazeron, P. Cornu, et al.
Brainstem gliomas in adults: prognostic factors and classification
Brain, December 1, 2001; 124(12): 2528 - 2539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
B. R. Korf
Malignancy in Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Oncologist, December 1, 2000; 5(6): 477 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
D. H. Gutmann
Learning Disabilities in Neurofibromatosis 1: Sizing Up the Brain
Arch Neurol, November 1, 1999; 56(11): 1322 - 1323.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. D. Griffiths, F. PhD, S. Blaser, W. Mukonoweshuro, D. Armstrong, G. Milo-Manson, and S. Cheung
Neurofibromatosis Bright Objects in Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Proliferative Potential?
Pediatrics, October 1, 1999; 104(4): 49e - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
D. A Walker, J. A G Punt, and M. Sokal
Clinical management of brain stem glioma
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 1999; 80(6): 558 - 564.
[Full Text]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Creange, J. Zeller, S. Rostaing-Rigattieri, P. Brugieres, J.-D. Degos, J. Revuz, and P. Wolkenstein
Neurological complications of neurofibromatosis type 1 in adulthood
Brain, March 1, 1999; 122(3): 473 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.