Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sander, J.W.A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sander, J.W.A. S.
NEUROLOGY 1997;49:333-337
© 1997 American Academy of Neurology

Difficulties in extrapolating from clinical trial data to clinical practice: The case of antiepileptic drugs

M. C. Walker, MB, MRCP and J.W.A. S. Sander, MD, PhD

From the Epilepsy Research Group, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to J.W.A.S. Sander, Epilepsy Research Group, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

Effective new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are needed for the treatment of those with refractory epilepsy. However, with the growing number of these drugs being licensed and marketed, a rational approach to the treatment of epilepsy is becoming essential. New AED trials can determine appropriate use of AEDs but ultimately fail to determine the best use of AEDs and their exact role in treating patients. New AED trials rarely use clinically applicable measures of efficacy, and it is difficult to extrapolate the data from populations used in AED trials to the wider population of patients with epilepsy. Furthermore, AED trials ignore the factors that are most likely to determine prognosis: the etiology, seizure types, and epilepsy syndrome. To resolve these issues, we need large multicenter studies in well-defined populations with well-characterized seizures, epilepsy syndromes, and etiologies. Being seizure free should be the primary measure of efficacy rather than meta-analyses and guidelines based upon incomplete data.


Supported by the Wellcome Trust (M.C.W.)

Received September 19, 1996. Accepted in final form March 12, 1997.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. Krakow, M. Walker, C. Otoul, and J.W.A.S. Sander
Long-term continuation of levetiracetam in patients with refractory epilepsy
Neurology, June 26, 2001; 56(12): 1772 - 1774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. Arroyo and J. W. A. S. Sander
Carbamazepine in comparative trials: Pharmacokinetic characteristics too often forgotten
Neurology, October 1, 1999; 53(6): 1170 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.