|
|
||||||||
From the Department of Neurology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, and Southern California Alzheimer Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Center, Downey, CA.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Helena Chui, Geriatric Neurobehavior and Alzheimer Center, Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center-800 Annex West, 7601 East Imperial Highway, Downey, CA 90242.
Objective.: This study examined the usefulness of the "Practice Parameters for the Evaluation of Dementia," published by the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (1994). The Practice Parameters are stratified according to three levels of certainty (standards, guidelines, and options), and suggest indications for the use of neuroimaging studies.
Methods.: We reviewed 119 consecutive cases referred for assessment of memory loss to a university-affiliated interdisciplinary clinic. We assessed the diagnostic value of laboratory, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging studies above the standard history, neurologic, and mental status examinations. We also assessed the sensitivity and specificity of four clinical indicators(i.e., early symptom onset, noninsidious course, focal neurologic signs or symptoms, and gait disturbance) for predicting the diagnostic utility of neuroimaging studies.
Results.: The largest changes in diagnostic categories between the standard and the comprehensive diagnostic process was a 9% decrease in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, a 6% increase in the diagnosis of mixed dementia (due largely to laboratory studies), and a 4% increase in the diagnosis of vascular dementia (due to neuroimaging). The clinical indicators were 82% sensitive and 50% specific in predicting that neuroimaging studies would change the diagnosis. In six cases, meaningful neuroimaging findings were not associated with any clinical indicator (5% false negatives). In 43 cases, neuroimaging provided no significant clinical findings despite the presence of an indicator (36% false positives).
Conclusions.: In this convenience sample, diagnostic accuracy was improved to a comparable degree by laboratory and neuroimaging studies, although at a significant difference in cost. Use of the four clinical indicators would have reduced the frequency of neuroimaging studies by 33% but missed clinically meaningful information in 5%. Although imperfect, the Practice Parameters represent a first step toward improving the cost effectiveness of the dementia work-up.
Supported by the National Institute on Aging (P01-AG12435, P50-AG05142, T32-AG00093) and the State of California Department of Health Services.
Received August 12, 1996. Accepted in final form April 25, 1997.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Clarfield The Decreasing Prevalence of Reversible Dementias: An Updated Meta-analysis Arch Intern Med, October 13, 2003; 163(18): 2219 - 2229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Rosenthal and N. Khotianov Managing Alzheimer Dementia Tomorrow J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2003; 16(5): 423 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Clark and J. H.T. Karlawish Alzheimer Disease: Current Concepts and Emerging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies Ann Intern Med, March 4, 2003; 138(5): 400 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H.T. Karlawish and C. M. Clark Diagnostic Evaluation of Elderly Patients with Mild Memory Problems Ann Intern Med, March 4, 2003; 138(5): 411 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H.S. Silverman, S. S. Gambhir, H.-W. C. Huang, J. Schwimmer, S. Kim, G. W. Small, J. Chodosh, J. Czernin, and M. E. Phelps Evaluating Early Dementia With and Without Assessment of Regional Cerebral Metabolism by PET: A Comparison of Predicted Costs and Benefits J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 253 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Frisoni, C. Geroldi, A. Beltramello, A. Bianchetti, G. Binetti, G. Bordiga, C. DeCarli, M. P. Laakso, H. Soininen, C. Testa, et al. Radial Width of the Temporal Horn: A Sensitive Measure in Alzheimer Disease AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 35 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. S. Silverman, G. W. Small, C. Y. Chang, C. S. Lu, M. A. K. de Aburto, W. Chen, J. Czernin, S. I. Rapoport, P. Pietrini, G. E. Alexander, et al. Positron Emission Tomography in Evaluation of Dementia: Regional Brain Metabolism and Long-term Outcome JAMA, November 7, 2001; 286(17): 2120 - 2127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Chow and C. H. MacLean Quality Indicators for Dementia in Vulnerable Community-Dwelling and Hospitalized Elders Ann Intern Med, October 16, 2001; 135(8_Part_2): 668 - 676. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Tierney, S. E. Black, J. P. Szalai, W. G. Snow, R. H. Fisher, G. Nadon, and H. C. Chui Recognition Memory and Verbal Fluency Differentiate Probable Alzheimer Disease From Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Dementia Arch Neurol, October 1, 2001; 58(10): 1654 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ikeda, K. Hokoishi, N. Maki, A. Nebu, N. Tachibana, K. Komori, K. Shigenobu, R. Fukuhara, and H. Tanabe Increased prevalence of vascular dementia in Japan: A community-based epidemiological study Neurology, September 11, 2001; 57(5): 839 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G B FRISONI Structural imaging in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: problems and tools J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2001; 70(6): 711 - 718. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Hogan and I. G. McKeith Of MCI and dementia: Improving diagnosis and treatment Neurology, May 8, 2001; 56(9): 1131 - 1132. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Knopman, S. T. DeKosky, J. L. Cummings, H. Chui, J. Corey-Bloom, N. Relkin, G. W. Small, B. Miller, and J. C. Stevens Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology, May 8, 2001; 56(9): 1143 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B FRISONI Visual rating and volumetry of the medial temporal lobe on magnetic resonance imaging in dementia J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2000; 69(5): 572 - 572. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Gifford, R. G. Holloway, and B. G. Vickrey Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules for Neuroimaging in the Evaluation of Dementia Arch Intern Med, October 9, 2000; 160(18): 2855 - 2862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Camicioli, P. Willert, J. Lear, S. Grossmann, J. Kaye, and P. Butterfield Dementia in Rural Primary Care Practices in Lake County, Oregon J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, July 1, 2000; 13(2): 87 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. O. Howard and J. M. Jenson Barriers to Development, Utilization, and Evaluation of Social Work Practice Guidelines: Toward an Action Plan for Social Work Research on Social Work Practice, May 1, 1999; 9(3): 347 - 364. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |