Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, K. M.
NEUROLOGY 1997;49:936-940
© 1997 American Academy of Neurology

Search patterns using the line bisection test for neglect

Manho Kim, MD, Jeffrey M. Anderson, MS and Kenneth M. Heilman, MD

From the Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, and the Neurology Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Gainesville, FL.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kenneth M. Heilman, Box 100236, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.

Background/Objective: Neglect has been attributed to sensory-attentional, motor-intentional, and representation disorders. Although patients with neglect may have defective visual exploration, the nature of this exploration deficit has not been entirely elucidated. The purpose of this study is to learn how, compared with control subjects, a patient with neglect performs visual exploration.

Methods: The line bisection test is commonly used to detect and evaluate the performance of patients with unilateral or hemispatial spatial neglect. We tested an experimental subject with left premotor-intentional neglect using an infrared eye monitoring instrument. Thirteen right-handed healthy volunteers served as control subjects. From different starting ocular positions, we assessed the direction of eye movements when the subjects initially oriented to the line, scanned the line, and then attempted to look at the center of the line.

Results: Independent of starting ocular position, normal subjects most often initially orient to the left end of the line, scan rightward, then look leftward to the center. However, the eye movements in our experimental subject with neglect were directed to the right end of the line without any scanning or leftward eye movement back to the center of the line.

Conclusion: Our subject with neglect had defective line exploration that may be attributed to a directional ocular motor intentional deficit.


Supported by the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Received October 21, 1996. Accepted in final form May 5, 1997.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. R. Riestra, K. B. Womack, G. P. Crucian, and K. M. Heilman
Is the middle between both halves?: Midpoint location and segment size estimation in neglect
Neurology, November 26, 2002; 59(10): 1580 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.