|
|
||||||||
From the Departments of Neurology (Drs. Macdonell, Jackson, Berkovic, Carey, and Scheffer, and J.M. Curatolo), Neurosurgery (A. Fabinyi), and Radiology (A. Syngeniotis), Brain Imaging Research Institute (Drs. Jackson and Abbott) & Centre for PET (Dr. Abbott), Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre; and University of Melbourne (Drs. Macdonell, Jackson, and Berkovic), Victoria, Australia.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Richard Macdonell, Department of Neurology, Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre, Heidelberg 3084, Victoria, Australia.
OBJECTIVE: Congenital brain lesions producing focal seizures may be accompanied by reorganization of the areas responsible for motor and sensory functions within the brain due to a phenomenon that has been termed "neuronal plasticity." This can be studied using functional MRI (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Using either method, the motor cortex can be localized noninvasively, but to date there have been few studies correlating the level of agreement between the two techniques.
METHODS: We used fMRI and TMS to localize the motor cortex in a young woman with intractable focal seizures, congenital left arm weakness, and a dysplastic right hemisphere on MRI.
RESULTS: There was excellent agreement in the localization of motor representation for each hand. Both were predominantly located in the left hemisphere. fMRI also showed an area of posterior activation in the right hemisphere, but there was no evidence of descending corticospinal projections from this site using TMS, direct cortical stimulation, and Wada testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Functional MRI (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were successfully used to localize cortical motor function before epilepsy surgery. Each technique demonstrated migration of motor function for the left hand to the left motor cortex. After resection of the dysplastic right precentral gyrus there was no permanent increase in weakness or disability. The two techniques are complementary; fMRI indicates all cortical areas activated by the motor task, whereas TMS identifies only those areas giving rise to corticospinal projections.
Key words: fMRITranscranial magnetic stimulationEpilepsyNeuronal plasticity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Boardman, V. Ganesan, M. A. Rutherford, D. E. Saunders, E. Mercuri, and F. Cowan Magnetic Resonance Image Correlates of Hemiparesis After Neonatal and Childhood Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Pediatrics, February 1, 2005; 115(2): 321 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Staudt, W. Grodd, C. Gerloff, M. Erb, J. Stitz, and I. Krageloh-Mann Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: A TMS and fMRI study Brain, October 1, 2002; 125(10): 2222 - 2237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-J. M. Rutten, N. F. Ramsey, P. C. Van Rijen, H. Franssen, and C. W. M. Van Veelen Interhemispheric Reorganization of Motor Hand Function to the Primary Motor Cortex Predicted With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation J Child Neurol, April 1, 2002; 17(4): 292 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |