HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bartolomeo, P. Articles by Chokron, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bartolomeo, P. Articles by Chokron, S.

Left unilateral neglect or right hyperattention?

From the INSERM Unit 324, Paris, and Neuropsychology Unit, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil (Dr. Bartolomeo), France; and the Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, CNRS ep 617, Grenoble, and Fondation Opthalmologique Rothschild, Paris (Dr. Chokron), France.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Paolo Bartolomeo, INSERM Unit 324, Centre Paul Broca, 2ter rue d’Alésia, F-75014 Paris, France.

BACKGROUND: Contradictory interpretations of left unilateral neglect suggest that it reflects either decreased attention toward the left or increased attention toward the right. According to the right-hyperattention postulate, increasing severity of neglect should result from an increasingly stronger bias toward the right. Thus, response times to right-sided targets should become progressively faster as neglect increases in severity across patients. The left-hypoattention postulate predicts that as neglect increases, progressively less-attentional resources are deployed in both hemispaces. Thus, response times to right targets should progressively increase with increasing neglect.

METHODS: We analyzed the distribution of manual response times to left- and right-sided targets in 24 patients with right hemisphere lesions and varying degrees of left neglect.

RESULTS: Not only the responses to left targets but also those to right targets became progressively slower as neglect increased, consistent with the hypoattention account. However, the two regression lines were not parallel. With increasing neglect, responses to left targets increased more steeply than those to right targets did.

CONCLUSIONS: A rightward attentional bias is present in patients with left neglect, together with left hypoattention. However, this rightward bias is one of defective, and not enhanced, attention.

Key words: Right brain damaged—Reaction time.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Bartolomeo, M. Thiebaut de Schotten, and F. Doricchi Left Unilateral Neglect as a Disconnection Syndrome Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2479 - 2490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Di Ferdinando, D. Parisi, and P. Bartolomeo Modeling Orienting Behavior and Its Disorders with "Ecological" Neural Networks J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2007; 19(6): 1033 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Bartolomeo, R Perri, and G Gainotti The influence of limb crossing on left tactile extinction J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2004; 75(1): 49 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Oliveri, P. M. Rossini, M. M. Filippi, R. Traversa, P. Cicinelli, M. G. Palmieri, P. Pasqualetti, and C. Caltagirone Time-dependent activation of parieto-frontal networks for directing attention to tactile space: A study with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses in right-brain-damaged patients with extinction Brain, September 1, 2000; 123(9): 1939 - 1947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]