| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
From the Johns Hopkins Epilepsy Center (Dr. Krauss, and S. Gondek and S. Paul), Baltimore, MD; the University of Maryland Epilepsy Center (Dr. Krumholz), Baltimore, MD; and The Washington Post (F. Shen), Washington, DC.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gregory L. Krauss, Meyer 2-147, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287; e-mail: gkrauss{at}jhmi.edu
OBJECTIVE: To examine the coverage of epilepsy in English language newspapers and magazines to determine how they portray the medical risks associated with epilepsy, whether they report research and treatment advances accurately, whether stigmatizing biases toward persons with epilepsy persist, and to examine the sources of errors in reporting about epilepsy.
BACKGROUND: The print media reflect and shape current views about epilepsy and other neurologic conditions. They also have the potential to further misconceptions about neurologic issues and particular brain disorders. Persistent myths about epilepsy, such as the ancient belief that it is a demonic disorder, can result in discrimination, emotional difficulties, and reluctance to seek effective treatment.
METHODS: A large commercial database was used to search for stories about epilepsy from approximately 2,000 English language newspapers and popular magazines. Two epileptologists independently classified story themes and main sources, and screened for the presence of gross errors in 210 stories about epilepsy or seizures. The authors analyzed the metaphors and terminology used to describe seizures and epilepsy.
RESULTS: The majority of English language print stories about epilepsy were accurate depictions of social and medical issues regarding the disorder, most commonly depictions of persons overcoming epilepsy and announcements of new therapies and reports of scientific advances. Thirty-one percent of the stories, however, contained gross errors, most commonly scientific inaccuracy, exaggerated treatment claims, and overestimates of the risks of dying during a seizure. New drug therapies were often described inaccurately by physicians and pharmaceutical spokespersons as curative and without side effects. Patients and their families frequently overemphasized the risk of dying during a seizure and misstated medical issues. Most celebrities with recurring seizures denied having epilepsy. Seizures were described with demonic imagery in 6% of stories. United States epilepsy associations discourage labeling patients as "epileptics"; however, the term was used in 45% of stories.
CONCLUSION: Physicians and reporters should be aware of both professional and popular biases that influence the print media’s presentation of the causes and consequences of epilepsy.
Key words: Epilepsy—Seizures—Medical journalism—Media.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. I. Sirven, J. F. Drazkowski, and K. H. Noe Seizures Among Public Figures: Lessons Learned From the Epilepsy of Pope Pius IX Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2007; 82(12): 1535 - 1540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Caspermeyer, E. J. Sylvester, J. F. Drazkowski, G. L. Watson, and J. I. Sirven Evaluation of Stigmatizing Language and Medical Errors in Neurology Coverage by US Newspapers Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 300 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J von Oertzen, H Urbach, S Jungbluth, M Kurthen, M Reuber, G Fernandez, and C E Elger Standard magnetic resonance imaging is inadequate for patients with refractory focal epilepsy J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2002; 73(6): 643 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Morrell and T. A. Pedley ""The Scarlet E"": Epilepsy is still a burden Neurology, May 23, 2000; 54(10): 1882 - 1883. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
