Neurology 2000;54:2055-2060
© 2000 American Academy of Neurology
Articles
A comparative study of the relative bioavailability of different interferon beta preparations
F. Deisenhammer, MD,
I. Mayringer, MD,
J. Harvey, PhD,
E. Dilitz, MD,
T. Gasse, MD,
D. Stadlbauer, MD,
M. Reindl, PhD and
T. Berger, MD
From the Department of Neurology (Drs. Deisenhammer, Mayringer, Dilitz, Gasse, Stadlbauer, Reindl, and Berger), University of Innsbruck, Austria; and Bayer Diagnostics (Dr. Harvey), Emeryville, CA.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Florian Deisenhammer, Department of Neurology, University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; e-mail: florian.deisenhammer{at}uibk.ac.at
BACKGROUND: Three different recombinant interferon beta (IFNß) preparations are currently available for the treatment of MS, two IFNß-1a products (Rebif and Avonex) and one IFNß-1b product (Betaferon). These products differ with respect to the recommended dose, the dosage regimen, and the injection route. This study compared the relative biologic activity of these three products in vitro and in vivo.
METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 237 patients with MS (170 on IFNß therapy and 67 control subjects receiving no therapy). Samples with neutralizing antibodies were excluded. Levels of the antiviral protein MxA and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM) in the four groups were measured by ELISA. In the in vitro investigation, untreated blood was incubated for 24 hours with increasing concentrations of the three IFNs from a dose of 1 IU/mL to 1000 IU/mL, after which levels of MxA were measured.
RESULTS: A difference between the groups was observed in vitro, with a significant change from baseline in MxA levels being observed at 10 IU for Betaferon compared with 100 IU for Rebif and Avonex. However, this might be due to the different methods used for the determination of IU by the manufacturers. At the single-dose level there were no significant differences between IFNß preparations. In vivo, there were significantly different levels of MxA in the four groups. In the Betaferon group, the median value for MxA was 2.29 ng/105 peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), compared with 1.00 ng/105 PBL for Rebif, 0.57 ng/105 PBL for Avonex, and 0.14 ng/105 PBL for the control group. Some significant differences between the groups were also apparent with respect to levels of sVCAM, which were higher with Betaferon than with Rebif.
CONCLUSION: IFNß-1b induces higher levels of the above markers of IFNß bioactivity than either of the two IFNß-1a preparations. Moreover, there is a less striking difference between the two IFNß-1a preparations in favor of subcutaneous IFNß-1a.
Key words: MSInterferon betaBioavailabilityMxAVascular cell adhesion molecule.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Pachner, D. Cadavid, L. Wolansky, and J. Skurnick
Effect of anti-IFN{beta} antibodies on MRI lesions of MS patients in the BECOME study
Neurology,
November 3, 2009;
73(18):
1485 - 1492.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Soelberg Sorensen
Review: Neutralizing antibodies against interferon-beta
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders,
September 1, 2008;
1(2):
125 - 141.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Sominanda, J Hillert, and A Fogdell-Hahn
In vivo bioactivity of interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients with neutralising antibodies is titre-dependent
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,
January 1, 2008;
79(1):
57 - 62.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Markowitz
Interferon-beta: Mechanism of action and dosing issues
Neurology,
June 12, 2007;
68(24_suppl_4):
S8 - S11.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A Farrell and G. Giovannoni
Measuring and management of Anti-Interferon Beta Antibodies in subjects with Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis,
June 1, 2007;
13(5):
567 - 577.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.R. Pachner
Real-time TaqMan assay for myxovirus resistance protein (MxA) mRNA: a robust marker of interferon beta bioactivity in patients with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis,
May 1, 2007;
13(1_suppl):
49 - 52.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Henson, R. Snelgrove, T. Hussell, D. J. Wells, and R. Aspinall
An IL-7 Fusion Protein That Shows Increased Thymopoietic Ability
J. Immunol.,
September 15, 2005;
175(6):
4112 - 4118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Sorensen, N. Koch-Henriksen, C. Ross, K. M. Clemmesen, K. Bendtzen, and the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Study Group
Appearance and disappearance of neutralizing antibodies during interferon-beta therapy
Neurology,
July 12, 2005;
65(1):
33 - 39.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Tangri, B. R. Mothe, J. Eisenbraun, J. Sidney, S. Southwood, K. Briggs, J. Zinckgraf, P. Bilsel, M. Newman, R. Chesnut, et al.
Rationally Engineered Therapeutic Proteins with Reduced Immunogenicity
J. Immunol.,
March 15, 2005;
174(6):
3187 - 3196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Pachner, A. Bertolotto, and F. Deisenhammer
Measurement of MxA mRNA or protein as a biomarker of IFN{beta} bioactivity: Detection of antibody-mediated decreased bioactivity (ADB)
Neurology,
November 11, 2003;
61(90095):
S24 - 26.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sturzebecher, K. P. Wandinger, A. Rosenwald, M. Sathyamoorthy, A. Tzou, P. Mattar, J. A. Frank, L. Staudt, R. Martin, and H. F. McFarland
Expression profiling identifies responder and non-responder phenotypes to interferon-{beta} in multiple sclerosis
Brain,
June 1, 2003;
126(6):
1419 - 1429.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bertolotto, F. Gilli, A. Sala, M. Capobianco, S. Malucchi, E. Milano, F. Melis, F. Marnetto, R. L.P. Lindberg, R. Bottero, et al.
Persistent neutralizing antibodies abolish the interferon {beta} bioavailability in MS patients
Neurology,
February 25, 2003;
60(4):
634 - 639.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M Kob, J Harvey, F Schautzer, S Kascha, D Bibl, R Egg, M Reindl, T Berger, and F Deisenhammer
A novel and rapid assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against interferon-beta
Multiple Sclerosis,
February 1, 2003;
9(1):
32 - 35.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-M. Vallittu, M. Halminen, J. Peltoniemi, J. Ilonen, I. Julkunen, A. Salmi, J.-P. Eralinna, and the Finnish Beta-Interferon Study Group
Neutralizing antibodies reduce MxA protein induction in interferon- beta-1a-treated MS patients
Neurology,
June 25, 2002;
58(12):
1786 - 1790.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dhib-Jalbut
Mechanisms of action of interferons and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis
Neurology,
April 23, 2002;
58(90084):
S3 - 9.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Goodin, E. M. Frohman, G. P. Garmany Jr., J. Halper, W. H. Likosky, F. D. Lublin, D. H. Silberberg, W. H. Stuart, and S. van den Noort
Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines
Neurology,
January 22, 2002;
58(2):
169 - 178.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Cook, J. R. Quinless, A. Jotkowitz, and P. Beaton
Serum IFN neutralizing antibodies and neopterin levels in a cross-section of MS patients
Neurology,
September 25, 2001;
57(6):
1080 - 1084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Rice
The Significance of Neutralizing Antibodies in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Interferon Beta
Arch Neurol,
August 1, 2001;
58(8):
1297 - 1298.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Reder and J. P. Antel
Injecting rationale into interferon-{beta} therapy
Neurology,
June 13, 2000;
54(11):
2034 - 2035.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|