Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buncher, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buncher, C. R.
Neurology 2000;54:635
© 2000 American Academy of Neurology


Articles

An EEG should not be obtained routinely after first unprovoked seizure in childhood

Donald L. Gilbert, MD and C. Ralph Buncher, ScD

From the Department of Neurology (Dr. Gilbert), Children’s Hospital Medical Center; and the Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Dr. Buncher), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Donald L. Gilbert, Department of Neurology, OSB5 Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify and analyze the value of expected information from an EEG after first unprovoked seizure in childhood.

BACKGROUND: An EEG is often recommended as part of the standard diagnostic evaluation after first seizure.

METHODS: A MEDLINE search from 1980 to 1998 was performed. From eligible studies, data on EEG results and seizure recurrence risk in children were abstracted, and sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EEG in predicting recurrence were calculated. Linear information theory was used to quantify and compare the expected information from the EEG in all studies. Standard test–treat decision analysis with a treatment threshold at 80% recurrence risk was used to determine the range of pretest recurrence probabilities over which testing affects treatment decisions.

RESULTS: Four studies involving 831 children were eligible for analysis. At best, the EEG had a sensitivity of 61%, a specificity of 71%, and an expected information of 0.16 out of a possible 0.50. The pretest probability of recurrence was less than the lower limit of the range for rational testing in all studies.

CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, the quantity of expected information from the EEG was too low to affect treatment recommendations in most patients. EEG should be ordered selectively, not routinely, after first unprovoked seizure in childhood.

Key words: EEG—First seizure—Children—Sensitivity—Specificity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
J. S. Doescher, T. J. deGrauw, B. S. Musick, D. W. Dunn, A. J. Kalnin, J. C. Egelhoff, A. W. Byars, V. P. Mathews, and J. K. Austin
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)and Electroencephalographic (EEG) Findings in a Cohort of Normal Children With Newly Diagnosed Seizures
J Child Neurol, June 1, 2006; 21(6): 490 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
C D Ferrie, J H Livingston, and M A Clarke
RCPCH guideline appraisal on EEG after first seizure
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2004; 89(1): 90 - 91.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
K. Aydin, C. Okuyaz, A. Serdaroglu, and K. Gucuyener
Utility of Electroencephalography in the Evaluation of Common Neurologic Conditions in Children
J Child Neurol, June 1, 2003; 18(6): 394 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
D. L. Gilbert and P. S. Gartside
Factors Affecting the Yield of Pediatric EEGs in Clinical Practice
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 2002; 41(1): 25 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. L. Gilbert, J. M. Freeman, D. Hirtz, S. Ashwal, A. Berg, D. Bettis, C. Camfield, P. Camfield, P. Crumrine, R. Elterman, et al.
Practice parameter: Evaluating a first nonfebrile seizure in children: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, the Child Neurology Society, and the American Epilepsy Society
Neurology, February 27, 2001; 56(4): 574 - 575.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. T. Berg, W. Arts, J. Boulloche, C. S. Camfield, P. Camfield, P. Jallon, J. Loiseau, P. Loiseau, S. Shinnar, D. J. Dlugos, et al.
An EEG should not be obtained routinely after first unprovoked seizure in childhood
Neurology, September 26, 2000; 55(6): 898 - 899.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. Hirtz, S. Ashwal, A. Berg, D. Bettis, C. Camfield, P. Camfield, P. Crumrine, R. Elterman, S. Schneider, and S. Shinnar
Practice parameter: Evaluating a first nonfebrile seizure in children: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, the Child Neurology Society, and the American Epilepsy Society
Neurology, September 12, 2000; 55(5): 616 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.