|
|
||||||||
From the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (Drs. Cohen and Fischer, and D.M. Bolibrush, A.J. Jak, J.E. Kniker, L.A. Mertz, and T.T. Skaramagas), Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH; and the Center for Research Methodology and Biometrics (Dr. Cutter), AMC Cancer Center, Lakewood, CO.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jeffrey A. Cohen, Mellen CenterU10, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195.
OBJECTIVE: To assess practice effects, and intrarater and interrater reliability of the MS functional composite (MSFC) outcome measure.
BACKGROUND: To address the poor reliability and insensitivity to change of available MS clinical rating scales, the National MS Societys Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force developed the MSFC, a multidimensional quantitative clinical outcome measure that includes tests of leg function/ambulation (Timed 25-Foot Walk), arm function (Nine-Hole Peg Test), and cognitive function (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test).
METHODS: Ten patients with secondary progressive MS underwent six testing sessions over a 2-week period. The MSFC was administered by the same examining technician in the first five sessions and by the other technician in the sixth. Patients were reassessed by both technicians after 6 months (sessions 7 and 8). The MSFC score was calculated as the mean of the Z scores of the three components. A pooled dataset derived from secondary progressive MS patients in the placebo arms of previous clinical trials and natural history studies served as the reference population to standardize scores.
RESULTS: Practice effects were evident initially but stabilized by the fourth administration. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.97 for the MSFC for session 4 versus session 5 (intrarater reliability). The ICC was 0.95 for session 5 versus session 6 (interrater reliability), and was 0.96 for session 7 versus session 8 when patients were reassessed 6 months later.
CONCLUSIONS: The MS functional composite (MSFC) outcome measure had excellent intrarater and interrater reliability when standardized procedures were used to train examining technicians and to assess patients. Prebaseline testing sessions should be included in clinical trials employing the MSFC to compensate for practice effects.
Key words: MSClinical trialsOutcome assessmentComposite measure
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Bellmann-Strobl, J. Wuerfel, O. Aktas, J. Dorr, K. D. Wernecke, F. Zipp, and F. Paul Poor PASAT performance correlates with MRI contrast enhancement in multiple sclerosis Neurology, November 17, 2009; 73(20): 1624 - 1627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rudick, C. Polman, J. Cohen, M. Walton, A. Miller, C Confavreux, F. Lublin, M Hutchinson, P. O'Connor, S. Schwid, et al. Assessing disability progression with the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2009; 15(8): 984 - 997. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Cardinal, S. Wilson, B. Giesser, A. Drain, and N. Sicotte A longitudinal fMRI study of the paced auditory serial addition task Multiple Sclerosis, May 1, 2008; 14(4): 465 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cohen, P. Calabresi, S. Chakraborty, K. Edwards, T. Eickenhorst, W. Felton III, E. Fisher, R. Fox, A. Goodman, C. Hara-Cleaver, et al. Avonex Combination Trial in relapsing--remitting MS: rationale, design and baseline data Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2008; 14(3): 370 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Solari, A. Motta, D. Radice, and L. Mendozzi A shortened version of PASAT-3 is feasible Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2007; 13(8): 1020 - 1025. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. de Groot, H. Beckerman, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, H. C. W. de Vet, G. J. Lankhorst, C. H. Polman, and L. M. Bouter The usefulness of evaluative outcome measures in patients with multiple sclerosis Brain, October 1, 2006; 129(10): 2648 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M M Nieuwenhuis, H Van Tongeren, P S Sorensen, and M Ravnborg The Six Spot Step Test: a new measurement for walking ability in multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2006; 12(4): 495 - 500. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bielekova, N. Kadom, E. Fisher, N. Jeffries, J. Ohayon, N. Richert, T. Howard, C. N. Bash, J. A. Frank, L. Stone, et al. MRI as a marker for disease heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis Neurology, October 11, 2005; 65(7): 1071 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Ravnborg, M Blinkenberg, F Sellebjerg, M Ballegaard, S H. Larsen, and P S. Sorensen Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale in comparison with the Expanded Disability Status Scale Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2005; 11(1): 81 - 84. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E L. Hoogervorst, J N. Zwemmer, B Jelles, C H Polman, and B M. Uitdehaag Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): relation to established measures of impairment and disability Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2004; 10(5): 569 - 574. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Vaney, S Vaney, and D T Wade SaGA S, the Short and Graphic A bility Score: an alternative scoring method for the motor components of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional C omposite Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2004; 10(2): 231 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C McGuigan and M Hutchinson The multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) is a reliable and sensitive measure J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2004; 75(2): 266 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E L. Hoogervorst, N F Kalkers, G R Cutter, B M. Uitdehaag, and C H Polman The patient's perception of a (reliable) change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional C omposite Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2004; 10(1): 55 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wall, K. R. Woodward, and C. F. Brito The Effect of Attention on Conventional Automated Perimetry and Luminance Size Threshold Perimetry Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2004; 45(1): 342 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R Schwid, C. M Tyler, E. A Scheid, A. Weinstein, A. D Goodman, and M. P McDermott Cognitive fatigue during a test requiring sustained attention: a pilot study Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2003; 9(5): 503 - 508. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R A Rudick, G Cutter, and S Reingold The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite: a new clinical outcome measure for multiple sclerosis trials Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2002; 8(5): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Cohen, G. R. Cutter, J. S. Fischer, A. D. Goodman, F. R. Heidenreich, M. F. Kooijmans, A. W. Sandrock, R. A. Rudick, J. H. Simon, N. A. Simonian, et al. Benefit of interferon {beta}-1a on MSFC progression in secondary progressive MS Neurology, September 10, 2002; 59(5): 679 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Schwid, A. D. Goodman, M. P. McDermott, C. F. Bever, and S. D. Cook Quantitative functional measures in MS: What is a reliable change? Neurology, April 23, 2002; 58(8): 1294 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Feys, M Duportail, D Kos, P Van Aschand, and P Ketelaer Validity of the TEMPA for the measurement of upper limb function in multiple sclerosis Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2002; 16(2): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Calabresi, J. L. Wilterdink, J. M. Rogg, P. Mills, A. Webb, and K. A. Whartenby An open-label trial of combination therapy with interferon {beta}-1a and oral methotrexate in MS Neurology, January 22, 2002; 58(2): 314 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. J. Hoogervorst, N. F. Kalkers, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, and C. H. Polman A Study Validating Changes in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Arch Neurol, January 1, 2002; 59(1): 113 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E L. Hoogervorst, N F Kalkers, L M. van Winsen, B M. Uitdehaag, and C H Polman Differential treatment effect on measures of neurologic exam, functional impairment and patient self-report in multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2001; 7(5): 335 - 339. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Cohen, G. R. Cutter, J. S. Fischer, A. D. Goodman, F. R. Heidenreich, A. J. Jak, J. E. Kniker, M. F. Kooijmans, J. M. Lull, A. W. Sandrock, et al. Use of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite as an Outcome Measure in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial Arch Neurol, June 1, 2001; 58(6): 961 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Rudick, G. Cutter, M. Baier, E. Fisher, D. Dougherty, B. Weinstock-Guttman, M. K. Mass, D. Miller, and N. A. Simonian Use of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite to predict disability in relapsing MS Neurology, May 22, 2001; 56(10): 1324 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.L.J. Hoogervorst, L.M.L. van Winsen, M.J. Eikelenboom, N.F. Kalkers, B.M.J. Uitdehaag, and C.H. Polman Comparisons of patient self-report, neurologic examination, and functional impairment in MS Neurology, April 10, 2001; 56(7): 934 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.F. Kalkers, L. Bergers, V. de Groot, R.H.C. Lazeron, M.A.A. van Walderveen, B.M.J. Uitdehaag, C.H. Polman, and F. Barkhof Concurrent validity of the MS Functional Composite using MRI as a biological disease marker Neurology, January 23, 2001; 56(2): 215 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Kaufman, D Moyer, and J Norton The significant change for the Timed 25-Foot Walk in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2000; 6(4): 286 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |