Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arzimanoglou, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, Th.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arzimanoglou, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, Th.
Neurology 2000;55:1472-1479
© 2000 American Academy of Neurology


Articles

Sturge–Weber syndrome

Indications and results of surgery in 20 patients

A. A. Arzimanoglou, MD, F. Andermann, MD, J. Aicardi, MD, C. Sainte–Rose, MD, M.-A. Beaulieu, MD, J.-G. Villemure, MD, A. Olivier, MD and Th. Rasmussen, MD

From the Service of Child Neurology and Metabolic Disorders (Drs. Arzimanoglou and Aicardi), University Hospital Robert Debré, the Service of Neurosurgery (Dr. Sainte–Rose), University Hospital Enfants Malades, Paris, France; the Service de Neurochirurgie (Dr. Villemure), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; and the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery (Drs. Andermann, Beaulieu, and Rasmussen), McGill University and the Montreal Neurological Hospital and Institute, Quebec, Canada.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alexis Arzimanoglou, Head, Epilepsy Program, Service de Neurologie Pédiatrique et des Maladies Métaboliques, Hôpital Robert Debré, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France; e-mail, alexis.arzimanoglou{at}rdb.ap-hop-paris.fr

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the indications and timing for resective surgery in patients with Sturge–Weber syndrome (SWS) and medication-resistant epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: SWS that causes epilepsy severe enough to merit surgery is rare. Because of the variable natural history of the disease, it is difficult to establish clear-cut indications for surgery and prospective studies are not feasible. Attitudes of clinicians and surgeons remain variable.

METHODS: The authors assessed the presurgical epilepsy profile, criteria for surgery, monitoring techniques, and the postoperative outcome of epilepsy in all patients with SWS consecutively admitted between 1972 and 1990 to two referral centers (Paris and Montreal) and underwent surgery for intractable seizures.

RESULTS: All 20 patients had a minimal postoperative follow-up of 4 years and all but one are still followed by one of the authors. One patient had a callosotomy, five underwent hemispherectomy, and 14 had cortical resection. Despite variability in the age at onset of seizures (range: 2 months to 12 years), age at operation (range: 8 months to 34 years) and surgical methods, almost all patients benefited from surgery. Visually guided complete resection of the pial angioma and underlying cortex, whenever possible, seemed sufficient; results were no better with intraoperative corticography. In children with previous hemiparesis, hemispherectomy proved particularly effective: all five became seizure free. None of the patients showed any aggravation of cognitive impairment following surgery; none of those who were operated on early presented with severe mental retardation, and 13 of 20 became seizure free.

CONCLUSION: Although the natural history of SWS is imperfectly known, increasing duration of seizures and of postictal deficits, increase in atrophy or of calcified lesions or both, are indicative of its progressive nature. Despite the expected heterogeneity that renders formal comparison of the various approaches difficult, the current study provides new evidence to support early surgery in patients with SWS and drug-resistant epilepsy. The authors’ results suggest that lesionectomy is a good approach, provided that the pial angioma is unilateral and the resection can be complete.–1479




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Rastogi, C. Lee, and N. Salamon
Neuroimaging in Pediatric Epilepsy: A Multimodality Approach1
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 1079 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. F. Tellez-Zenteno, R. Dhar, and S. Wiebe
Long-term seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Brain, May 1, 2005; 128(5): 1188 - 1198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
M. S. Hussain, D. J. Emery, J. R. Lewis, and W. S. Johnston
Sturge-Weber syndrome diagnosed in a 45-year-old man
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 25, 2004; 170(11): 1672 - 1672.
[Full Text]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
E. H. Kossoff, C. Buck, and J. M. Freeman
Outcomes of 32 hemispherectomies for Sturge-Weber syndrome worldwide
Neurology, December 10, 2002; 59(11): 1735 - 1738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.