Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daffner, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Holcomb, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daffner, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Holcomb, P. J.
Neurology 2001;56:1377-1383
© 2001 American Academy of Neurology


Articles

Pathophysiology underlying diminished attention to novel events in patients with early AD

K. R. Daffner, MD;, D.M. Rentz, PsyD;, L. F.M. Scinto, PhD;, R. Faust, BS;, A. E. Budson, MD; and P. J. Holcomb, PhD

From the Brigham Behavioral Neurology Group and Laboratory of Higher Cortical Functions (Drs. Daffner, Rentz, Scinto, Budson, and R. Faust), Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston; and the Department of Psychology (Dr. Holcomb), Tufts University, Medford, MA.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kirk R. Daffner, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: kdaffner{at}parners.org

BACKGROUND: Patients with mild to moderate AD often are apathetic and fail to attend to novel aspects of their environment.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the mechanisms underlying these changes by studying the novelty P3 response that measures shifts of attention toward novel events.

METHODS: While event-related potentials were recorded, mildly impaired AD patients and matched normal controls (NC) viewed line drawings that included a repetitive background stimulus, an infrequent target stimulus, and infrequent novel stimuli. Subjects controlled how long they viewed each stimulus by pressing a button. This served as a measure of their allocation of attention. They also responded to targets by depressing a foot pedal. Patients did not differ from NC in age, education, estimated IQ, or mood but were judged by informants to be more apathetic.

RESULTS: P3 amplitude to novel stimuli was significantly smaller for AD patients than NC. However, P3 amplitude to target stimuli did not differ between groups. For NC, P3 response to novel stimuli was much larger than to background stimuli. In contrast, for patients with AD, there was no difference in P3 response to novel vs background stimuli. Although NC spent more time looking at novel than background stimuli, patients with AD distributed their viewing time evenly. Remarkably, for patients with AD, the amplitude of the novelty P3 response powerfully predicted how long they would spend looking at novel stimuli (R2 = 0.52) and inversely correlated with apathy severity.

CONCLUSIONS: The decreased attention to novel events exhibited by patients with AD cannot be explained by a nonspecific reduction in their attentional abilities. The novelty P3 response is markedly diminished in mild AD, at a time when the target P3 response is preserved. The disruption of the novelty P3 response predicts diminished attention to novel stimuli and is associated with the apathy exhibited by patients with AD.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
H. Chong, J. L. Riis, S. M. McGinnis, D. M. Williams, P. J. Holcomb, and K. R. Daffner
To ignore or explore: top-down modulation of novelty processing.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2008; 20(1): 120 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
K. R. Daffner, K. K. Ryan, D. M. Williams, A. E. Budson, D. M. Rentz, D. A. Wolk, and P. J. Holcomb
Increased Responsiveness to Novelty is Associated with Successful Cognitive Aging.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., October 1, 2006; 18(10): 1759 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi.Home page
R. van Reekum, D. T. Stuss, and L. Ostrander
Apathy: Why Care?
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, February 1, 2005; 17(1): 7 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. M. Roth, L. A. Flashman, A. J. Saykin, T. W. McAllister, and R. Vidaver
Apathy in Schizophrenia: Reduced Frontal Lobe Volume and Neuropsychological Deficits
Am J Psychiatry, January 1, 2004; 161(1): 157 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
K. R. Daffner, L. F. M. Scinto, A. M. Weitzman, R. Faust, D. M. Rentz, A. E. Budson, and P. J. Holcomb
Frontal and Parietal Components of a Cerebral Network Mediating Voluntary Attention to Novel Events
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2003; 15(2): 294 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch PsychiatryHome page
Neural Processing of Novel Events Disrupted in Early Alzheimer's Disease
Journal Watch Psychiatry, October 18, 2001; 2001(1018): 14 - 14.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
Neural Processing of Novel Events Disrupted in Early Alzheimer's Disease
Journal Watch Neurology, August 23, 2001; 2001(823): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.