HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tracy, J. I. Articles by Laskas, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tracy, J. I. Articles by Laskas, J. W.

Cerebellar mediation of the complexity of bimanual compared to unimanual movements

From the Departments of Neurology and Radiology (Drs. Tracy and Madi), Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Department of Radiology (Drs. Faro and Mohammed, and A. Pinus), MCP Hahnemann University School of Medicine, Philadelphia; and Ursinus College (J. Laskas), Collegeville, PA.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. J.I. Tracy, Departments of Neurology and Radiology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S. 11 Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107; e-mail: joseph.tracy{at}mail.tju.edu

Objective:— To study rapidly alternating movements under fMRI in order to identify the brain regions that mediate increased complexity in bimanual vs unimanual movements and to verify the localization of a clinical test of limb ataxia (diadochokinesis).

Methods:— Unimanual and bimanual movements, that is, palm(s) pronated then supinated, served as stimulation in a block design fMRI investigation at 1.5 T. Analyses compared bimanual movements and rest for each hand separately and the unimanual conditions combined. A pronation/supination task was chosen as it provides the same objective motor output during unimanual and bimanual formats. The increased coordination demand of the bimanual format (phase/antiphase movements) was expected to result in distinct activation in supplementary motor, primary motor, prefrontal, and cerebellar regions.

Results:— The bimanual task uniquely elicited responses in specific anterior medial and posterior (vermal) cerebellar regions.

Conclusions:— The study corroborated clinical use of diadochokinesis tasks to test for aspects of cerebellar integrity. The data do not support the literature emphasizing basal ganglia mediation of this type of coordinated movement. Cerebellar medial and vermal regions (in connection with central nuclei) are proposed as the locus within the cerebellum for mediating complexity, that is, the effective integration of separate limb movements that proceed in an asynchronous but systematic fashion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Pollok, M. Butz, J. Gross, and A. Schnitzler Intercerebellar coupling contributes to bimanual coordination. J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 704 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Heuninckx, N. Wenderoth, F. Debaere, R. Peeters, and S. P. Swinnen Neural Basis of Aging: The Penetration of Cognition into Action Control J. Neurosci., July 20, 2005; 25(29): 6787 - 6796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Bracewell, R. Balasubramaniam, and A. M. Wing Interlimb coordination deficits during cyclic movements in cerebellar hemiataxia Neurology, February 22, 2005; 64(4): 751 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kuriyama, R. Stickgold, and M. P. Walker Sleep-dependent learning and motor-skill complexity Learn. Mem., November 1, 2004; 11(6): 705 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]