HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Matsumoto, J. Articles by Rodriguez, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Matsumoto, J. Articles by Rodriguez, M. Related Collections Tremor Clinical trials Methodology/study design Multiple sclerosis

Surgical therapy for tremor in multiple sclerosis

An evaluation of outcome measures

From the Departments of Neurology (Drs. Matsumoto, Ahlskog, Noseworthy, Rodriguez, and D. Sneve), Neurosurgery (Dr. Davis), and the Biomechanics Laboratory (Dr. Kaufman, D. Morrow, and A. Walker), Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Joseph Y. Matsumoto, Department of Neurology E8A, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905; e-mail: jmatsumoto{at}mayo.edu

Objective:— To assess the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of outcome measures that might be used in a clinical trial of surgery for the treatment of severe tremor associated with MS (MS tremor).

Methods:— Nine patients with MS tremor were evaluated before and 3 and 12 months after thalamic surgery (six thalamotomy, three deep brain stimulation). A clinical tremor rating scale (CTRS), a novel quantitative movement analysis technique (QMA), and a variety of measures of disability, neurologic impairment, and quality of life was utilized.

Results:— Both the CTRS and QMA were reliable measures of tremor and both were sensitive to the improvement in tremor following surgery. However, QMA correlated with disability measures and corresponded better to patient and examiner assessment of surgical results. The disability scales used were insensitive to functional improvements that may follow surgery. The box and blocks test clearly separated three patients who had excellent results from three who had poor results. Baseline QMA values predicted improvement on the box and blocks test.

Conclusions:— 1) QMA is a reliable, objective and valid measure of MS tremor that could be used in a clinical trial. 2) The box and blocks test can detect the improvement in prehensile function that follows surgery, but standard disability scales are poorly responsive to this change. 3) Preoperative QMA values may predict which patients are most amenable to functional improvement after surgery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A Diamond and J Jankovic The effect of deep brain stimulation on quality of life in movement disorders J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2005; 76(9): 1188 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H A Wishart, D W Roberts, R M Roth, B C McDonald, D J Coffey, A C Mamourian, C Hartley, L A Flashman, C E Fadul, and A J Saykin Chronic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of tremor in multiple sclerosis: review and case reports J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2003; 74(10): 1392 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S H Alusi, S Glickman, N Patel, J Worthington, and P G Bain Target board test for the quantification of ataxia in tremulous patients Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2003; 17(2): 140 - 149. [Abstract] [PDF]