HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary data Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McCrory, P. R. Articles by Berkovic, S. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McCrory, P. R. Articles by Berkovic, S. F. Related Collections History of Neurology Brain trauma

Concussion

The history of clinical and pathophysiological concepts and misconceptions

From the Brain Research Institute & Epilepsy Research Institute (Dr. Berkovic) and Centre for Sports Medicine Research & Education (Dr. McCrory), University of Melbourne, Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Paul McCrory, 31 Grosvenor Parade, Balwyn, Victoria 3103, Australia; e-mail: pmccrory{at}compuserve.com

Concussion is a well-recognized clinical entity; however, its pathophysiologic basis remains a mystery. One unresolved issue is whether concussion is associated with lesser degrees of diffuse structural change seen in severe traumatic brain injury, or is the mechanism entirely caused by reversible functional changes. This issue is clouded not only by the lack of critical data, but also by confusion in terminology, even in contemporary literature. This confusion began in ancient times when no distinction was made between the transient effects of concussion and severe traumatic brain injury. The first clear separate recognition of concussion was made by the Persian physician, Rhazes, in the 10th century. Lanfrancus subsequently expanded this concept as brain "commotion" in the 13th century, although other Renaissance physicians continued to obscure this concept. By the 18th century, a variety of hypotheses for concussion had emerged. The 19th century discovery of petechial hemorrhagic lesions in severe traumatic brain injury led to these being posited as the basis of concussion, and a similar logic was used later to suggest diffuse axonal injury was responsible. The neuropathology and pathophysiology of concussion has important implications in neurology, sports medicine, medicolegal medicine, and in the understanding of consciousness. Fresh approaches to these questions are needed and modern research tools, including functional imaging and experimental studies of ion-channel function, could help elucidate this puzzle that has evolved over the past 3,000 years.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. P. Meehan III and R. G. Bachur Sport-Related Concussion Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(1): 114 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Koehler and E. F. M. Wijdicks Historical study of coma: looking back through medical and neurological texts Brain, March 1, 2008; 131(3): 877 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P McCrory Using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut: the modern management of concussion Inj. Prev., December 1, 2007; 13(6): 364 - 365. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P McCrory, M Makdissi, G Davis, and A Collie Value of neuropsychological testing after head injuries in football Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2005; 39(suppl_1): i58 - i63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Souayah and J. I. Greenstein Insights into neurologic localization by Rhazes, a medieval Islamic physician Neurology, July 12, 2005; 65(1): 125 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P McCrory Commotio cordis Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2002; 36(4): 236 - 237. [Full Text] [PDF]