Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hacke, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hacke, W.
Neurology 2001;57:S61-S68
© 2001 American Academy of Neurology


Articles

Treatment options for large hemispheric stroke

Thorsten Steiner, MD, Peter Ringleb, MD and Werner Hacke, MD, PhD

From the Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Werner Hacke, Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Some stroke patients suffering acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction develop massive brain edema and herniation, a condition known as malignant MCA infarction. Severe swelling increases intracranial pressure (ICP) and leads to progressive brainstem dysfunction. Once ICP reaches critical values (>30 mm Hg) herniation occurs, usually within 2 to 5 days. Patients rarely survive (80% mortality) with standard treatment, and those who do are often severely disabled. Malignant MCA infarction is often missed by neurologists, despite well-defined clinical and neuroimaging (CT scan) diagnostic criteria. After diagnosis, conventional treatments such as osmotherapy, barbiturates, buffers, and hyperventilation center on reducing ICP. The goal of hyperosmolar therapy is to increase the serum osmolarity to approximately 315–320 mOsm/L. Enteric glycerol is used routinely to reduce ICP. In more severe cases and when glycerol fails, mannitol may be administered. Other therapies are also available, including hypertonic saline solution, THAM (Tris-hydroxy-methyl-aminomethane) buffer, and high-dose barbiturates. Hyperventilation also helps reduce ICP. All measures work effectively for a short time only. Other approaches to control elevated ICP, including decompression surgery and hypothermia, have shown promising results. In the Heidelberg decompression surgery trial, mortality in surgically treated patients was significantly lower (32%) than in non-treated patients (76%) despite conventional treatment. Importantly, of the surviving treated patients, 66% were rated independent with only mild to moderate disability. Moderate hypothermia (33–36 °C) has recently been shown to be effective in severe MCA infarction. Hypothermia induction within 14 hours of ischemic injury and maintained for 72 hours significantly reduced ICP and mortality (44%).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Bardutzky and S. Schwab
Antiedema Therapy in Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 3084 - 3094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
E Uhl, F W Kreth, B Elias, A Goldammer, R G Hempelmann, M Liefner, G Nowak, M Oertel, K Schmieder, and G-H Schneider
Outcome and prognostic factors of hemicraniectomy for space occupying cerebral infarction
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2004; 75(2): 270 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.