Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fieschi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Falcou, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fieschi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Falcou, A.
Neurology 2001;57:S82-S86
© 2001 American Academy of Neurology


Articles

Keynote address

Cesare Fieschi, MD and Anne Falcou, MD, PhD

From the University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Cesare Fieschi, Department of Neurological Sciences, Viale dell’Università, 30, 00185 Rome, Italy.

"Acute strokes are here to stay": this could be the sad conclusion after decades of stroke research. Generalized prevention of ischemic stroke is not fully successful. After the decline in stroke incidence observed by 1970, partly related to better management of vascular risk factors, there has again been an increase in stroke frequency all around the world. This phenomenon may be explained by the lack of educational modalities for modification of lifestyle behavior, the small impact of high-risk individual prevention strategy, and the lack of rationale and guidelines for multiple approaches. In the meantime, the benefits of acute intensive management of stroke have been demonstrated. There is now considerable evidence that careful monitoring and management of general and cerebral functions in a dedicated stroke unit or by a specialized stroke team are superior to management in a neurologic or general ward. Currently, one way of optimizing limited personnel resources is to connect the stroke unit of a main hospital with peripheral hospitals via a computer network. Experts in the central stroke unit can then make on-line evaluations of CT and ultrasound examinations performed in the local hospital and recommend the best course of patient management. This new approach of treating stroke as an emergency will also require educational programs directed at the general public, general practitioners, and primary and emergency department physicians, to teach the recognition of stroke symptoms and the importance of treating stroke with the same urgency as for myocardial infarction (MI).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.