Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jäncke, L.
Right arrow Articles by Shah, N.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jäncke, L.
Right arrow Articles by Shah, N.J.
Related Collections
Right arrow All Neurotology
Right arrow Audition
Neurology 2002;58:736-743
© 2002 American Academy of Neurology

Does dichotic listening probe temporal lobe functions?

L. Jäncke, PhD and N.J. Shah, PhD

From the Institute of General Psychology (Dr. Jäncke), Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg; and the Institute of Medicine (Dr. Shah), Research Center Jülich, Germany.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Lutz Jäncke, Institute of General Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany; e-mail: lutz.jaencke{at}nat.uni-magdeburg.de

Objective: To explore cortical hemodynamic responses using fMRI in the context of three dichotic listening tasks.

Background: Dichotic listening is a widely used behavioral technique indicating brain laterality during which subjects are presented with two different auditory signals at the same time, one arriving at each ear. fMRI offers the potential to explore the hemodynamic response during dichotic listening and to relate the behavioral indices with these cortical measures.

Method: fMRI was performed for 10 right-handed normal subjects listening to consonant–vowel syllable pairs with the task of detecting a "target" syllable by pressing a button. The target stimulus appeared equally often in the left and right ear. The subjects were instructed to either concentrate on the stimuli presented in both ears (DIV) or only in the left ear (FL) or right ear (FR). In addition, a control condition was used during which the syllables were presented binaurally. Hemodynamic responses were measured by applying whole-head echo planar imaging techniques and statistically analyzed by using statistical parametric mapping (SPM99) software.

Results: During dichotic listening, there were generally extended activations in frontotemporal networks. For the DIV condition, the authors found strong bilateral activations in the inferior frontal gyrus, Broca’s area, the left middle frontal gyrus, and in the left superior temporal gyrus. During the FL condition, there was an additional cluster in the right inferior frontal gyrus. For the FR condition, there were stronger activations in Broca’s area and the left superior temporal gyrus.

Conclusions: These findings were taken as evidence that dichotic listening is more demanding, requiring more processing capacity distributed in frontotemporal networks. The behavioral measures of dichotic listening were not simply a function of temporal lobe activation. Rather, the cortical activations support the notion that different processing strategies controlled by different neural structures are applied during dichotic listening.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. van Wageningen, H. A. Jorgensen, K. Specht, and K. Hugdahl
A 1H-MR Spectroscopy Study of Changes in Glutamate and Glutamine (Glx) Concentrations in Frontal Spectra after Administration of Memantine
Cereb Cortex, July 15, 2009; (2009) bhp145v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. T. Hill and L. M. Miller
Auditory Attentional Control and Selection during Cocktail Party Listening
Cereb Cortex, July 2, 2009; (2009) bhp124v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Hocking and C. J. Price
The Role of the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus in Audiovisual Processing
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2008; 18(10): 2439 - 2449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Della Penna, A. Brancucci, C. Babiloni, R. Franciotti, V. Pizzella, D. Rossi, K. Torquati, P. M. Rossini, and G. L. Romani
Lateralization of Dichotic Speech Stimuli is Based on Specific Auditory Pathway Interactions: Neuromagnetic Evidence
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 2303 - 2311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Bidet-Caulet, C. Fischer, J. Besle, P.-E. Aguera, M.-H. Giard, and O. Bertrand
Effects of Selective Attention on the Electrophysiological Representation of Concurrent Sounds in the Human Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9252 - 9261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Ahveninen, I. P. Jaaskelainen, T. Raij, G. Bonmassar, S. Devore, M. Hamalainen, S. Levanen, F.-H. Lin, M. Sams, B. G. Shinn-Cunningham, et al.
Task-modulated "what" and "where" pathways in human auditory cortex
PNAS, September 26, 2006; 103(39): 14608 - 14613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. A. Johnson and R. J. Zatorre
Attention to Simultaneous Unrelated Auditory and Visual Events: Behavioral and Neural Correlates
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1609 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Kaiser, I. Hertrich, H. Ackermann, K. Mathiak, and W. Lutzenberger
Hearing Lips: Gamma-band Activity During Audiovisual Speech Perception
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2005; 15(5): 646 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.