|
|
||||||||
From the Departments of Neurology (Drs. Rabinstein and Wijdicks) and Neurosurgery (Dr. Atkinson), NeurologicalNeurosurgical Intensive Care Unit, Saint Marys Hospital, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Eelco F.M. Wijdicks, Department of Neurology, W8B, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: wijde{at}mayo.edu
Background: Supratentorial intracerebral hematomas often are evacuated in rapidly deteriorating patients. Surgery may prevent death but not necessarily disability. The authors studied the outcome of emergent clot evacuation in patients with worsening massive intracerebral hemorrhage.
Methods: The authors reviewed data on 26 consecutive, acutely worsening patients with nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage who had surgery for clot evacuation. All patients had clinical (stupor or coma, loss of pontomesencephalic brainstem reflexes, extensor posturing) or radiologic (midline shift of septum pellucidum
1 cm downward or obliteration of the ambient and suprasellar cisterns caused by displacement of the temporal uncus) signs of herniation. Outcome was defined using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).
Results: Fifty-six percent of patients died (GOS 1), 22% remained severely disabled (GOS 3), and 22% regained independence (GOS 45). Considering findings before surgery, upper brainstem reflexes were preserved more often in survivors (66% vs 14%; p = 0.01). All patients who had a combination of absent pupillary, corneal, and oculocephalic reflexes and extensor posturing before craniotomy died. No patient lacking corneal or oculocephalic reflexes prior to surgery regained functional independence.
Conclusions: Craniotomy for rapidly worsening patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage and radiologic signs of brain tissue shift may result in functional independence in approximately a quarter of patients. However, all comatose patients who lost upper brainstem reflexes and had extensor posturing died despite surgery.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. Rabinstein and M. N. Diringer Withholding care in intracerebral hemorrhage: Realistic compassion or self-fulfilling prophecy? Neurology, May 15, 2007; 68(20): 1647 - 1648. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Rabinstein and E. F. M. Wijdicks Determinants of Outcome in Anticoagulation-Associated Cerebral Hematoma Requiring Emergency Evacuation Arch Neurol, February 1, 2007; 64(2): 203 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Manno, J. L. D. Atkinson, J. R. Fulgham, and E. F. M. Wijdicks Emerging Medical and Surgical Management Strategies in the Evaluation and Treatment of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2005; 80(3): 420 - 433. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Who Benefits from Emergency Craniotomy for Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage? Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, August 14, 2002; 2002(814): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Emergent Craniotomy for Expanding Cerebral Hematomas Journal Watch Neurology, July 12, 2002; 2002(712): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Gebel and W. J. Powers Emergency craniotomy for intracerebral hemorrhage: When doesn't it help and does it ever help? Neurology, May 14, 2002; 58(9): 1325 - 1326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |