Neurology®
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed Neurology journal
Quick Search
Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Meisner, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Meisner, P. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow All Clinical trials
Right arrow Clinical trials Randomized controlled (CONSORT agreement)
Right arrow All Pain
Right arrow Neuropathic pain

Neurology 2002;59:1694-1700
© 2002 American Academy of Neurology

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a glycine antagonist in neuropathic pain

M. S. Wallace, MD, M. C. Rowbotham, MD, N. P. Katz, MD, R. H. Dworkin, PhD, R. M. Dotson, MD, B. S. Galer, MD, R. L. Rauck, MD, M. M. Backonja, MD, S. N. Quessy, PhD and P. D. Meisner, PharmD

From the University of California–San Diego School of Medicine (Dr. Wallace) and University of California–San Francisco (Dr. Rowbotham); Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Dr. Katz), Boston, MA; University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (Dr. Dworkin), NY; Mayo Clinic (Dr. Dotson), Rochester, MN; Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Dr. Galer), Chadds Ford, PA; Wake Forest University Medical Center (Dr. Rauck), Winston–Salem, NC; University of Wisconsin–Madison Medical School (Dr. Backonja); and GlaxoSmithKline (Drs. Quessy and Meisner), Research Triangle Park, NC.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mark S. Wallace, Center for Pain and Palliative Medicine, University of California–San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., 0924, La Jolla, CA 92093-0924; e-mail: mswallace{at}ucsd.edu

Background: Nerve injury results in increases in spinal glutamate, which opens the NMDA ionophore channel, causing an influx of calcium. A glycine-binding site must be occupied for the channel to open. GV196771 is a selective antagonist of the glycine-binding site of the NMDA ionophore.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of GV196771 in subjects with chronic neuropathic pain in a proof-of-concept study.

Methods: With informed consent, 63 subjects (31 placebo, 32 GV196771) with neuropathic pain (diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, complex regional pain syndrome, or peripheral nerve injury), a visual analogue score averaging >=30 mm during the screening period, and a well-defined primary area of mechanical allodynia were recruited for the study. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study design was utilized. Subjects came to the research center for a total of five visits over a 21-day period, which consisted of a 14-day treatment period followed by a 7-day washout period. Spontaneous and evoked pain scores, mechanical sensory testing, quantitative sensory testing, Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, patient global satisfaction, and safety assessments were made during the study.

Results: There was no significant effect of GV196771 on spontaneous or evoked pain, quantitative sensory testing, or patient global satisfaction. There was a significant effect of GV196771 on the area of dynamic and static allodynia on days 7 and 14. The overall incidence of adverse events during treatment was similar for GV196771 (56%) and placebo (71%). The incidence of drug-related adverse events during treatment was higher for placebo (42%) than GV196771 (28%).

Conclusions: Although the glycine antagonists show anti-hyperalgesic action in animal models of neuropathic pain, GV196771 does not appear to be an effective treatment in subjects with chronic neuropathic pain. This may be due to insufficient penetration of GV196771 to central sites of action, differences between the human and animal glycine receptors, or differences between neuropathic pain in animal models and humans.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Dray
Neuropathic pain: emerging treatments
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2008; 101(1): 48 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
C. Villmann and C.-M. Becker
On the Hypes and Falls in Neuroprotection: Targeting the NMDA Receptor
Neuroscientist, December 1, 2007; 13(6): 594 - 615.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. L Somers and F R. Clemente
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for the Management of Neuropathic Pain: The Effects of Frequency and Electrode Position on Prevention of Allodynia in a Rat Model of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type II
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2006; 86(5): 698 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
J. W. Polli, T. M. Baughman, J. E. Humphreys, K. H. Jordan, A. L. Mote, L. O. Webster, R. J. Barnaby, G. Vitulli, L. Bertolotti, K. D. Read, et al.
THE SYSTEMIC EXPOSURE OF AN N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST IS LIMITED IN MICE BY THE P-GLYCOPROTEIN AND BREAST CANCER RESISTANCE PROTEIN EFFLUX TRANSPORTERS
Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2004; 32(7): 722 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]