HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Data Supplement Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lindeboom, R. Articles by De Haan, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lindeboom, R. Articles by De Haan, R. J. Related Collections All Health Services Research Outcome research

Activities of daily living instruments

Optimizing scales for neurologic assessments

From the Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr. Lindeboom, R. Holman, and Dr. De Haan) and Neurology (Dr. Vermeulen), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. M. Vermeulen, Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, the Netherlands; e-mail: m.vermeulen{at}amc.uva.nl

The ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) is an important part of assessment in neurologic patients. A literature search was carried out to identify multi-item ADL scales developed for the assessment of neurologic patients, comparing item content, range, and detail of ADL scales. Of the 113 ADL scales identified, 27 (24%) were designed for use in neurology. In the basic ADL (BADL) domains (basic mobility and self-care), individual items were present in 44% to 81% of instruments. In the extended ADL (EADL) domains (e.g., outdoor mobility, housekeeping), items were present in up to 67% of the instruments identified. A typical trade-off was observed between the range, the detail (number of items), and hence the practicality of a scale. In general, scales focus on either BADL or EADL domains or, on occasion, some of both, rather than measuring the full range of functioning. There are many ADL scales in neurology, with much overlap in item content, leading to redundancy. New scales developed with the traditional methods will not solve the existing difficulties associated with range and detail, ordinal scale scores, and cross-instrument comparability. The possibilities of a modern psychometric method known as item response theory that was designed to solve these problems are discussed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Muslimovic, B. Post, J. D. Speelman, B. Schmand, R. J. de Haan, and For the CARPA Study Group Determinants of disability and quality of life in mild to moderate Parkinson disease Neurology, June 3, 2008; 70(23): 2241 - 2247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Weisscher, B. Post, R. J. de Haan, C.A.W. Glas, J. D. Speelman, and M. Vermeulen The AMC Linear Disability Score in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease Neurology, December 4, 2007; 69(23): 2155 - 2161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Lindeboom, B. Schmand, R. Holman, R. J. de Haan, and M. Vermeulen Improved brief assessment of cognition in aging and dementia Neurology, August 10, 2004; 63(3): 543 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Birnboim and A. Miller Cognitive strategies application of multiple sclerosis patients Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2004; 10(1): 67 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF]