Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Suilleabhain, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Suilleabhain, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, R. B., Jr.
Related Collections
Right arrow Parkinson's disease/Parkinsonism
Right arrow Tremor
Right arrow Surgery/Stimulation

Neurology 2003;60:786-790
© 2003 American Academy of Neurology

Tremor response to polarity, voltage, pulsewidth and frequency of thalamic stimulation

Padraig E. O’Suilleabhain, MB BCh, William Frawley, PhD, Cole Giller, MD PhD and Richard B. Dewey, Jr., MD

From the Departments of Neurology (P.E. O’Suilleabhain and Dr. Dewey), Biostatistics (Dr. Frawley), and Neurosurgery (Dr. Giller), UT Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Padraig E. O’Suilleabhain, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9036; e-mail: Padraig.osuilleabhain{at}UTSouthwestern.edu

Background: Thalamic deep brain stimulation ameliorates essential and parkinsonian tremors refractory to medications. Stimulus voltage, polarity configuration, frequency, and pulsewidth can each be adjusted in order to optimize tremor control and maximize battery life. The relative impacts of these programmable variables have not previously been quantified.

Methods: The thalamus of 11 patients (bilaterally in 2) was studied 4 to 59 months postoperatively. The stimulator was inactivated and medications withheld for 12 hours, and optimal electrode contacts were selected. Stimulation followed at a range of voltages (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 V), pulsewidths (60, 90, or 120 µs), and frequencies (130, 160, or 185 Hz) for both monopolar and bipolar configurations. Seventy-eight combinations of variables were programmed in random sequence. Postural and action tremors were measured with an electromagnetic tracker, tremor was subjectively graded, and side effects were noted.

Results: Voltage was consistently predictive of tremor response. Mean postural tremor amplitude in PD fell from 6.4 cm at 0 V to 2.6, 1.0, 0.3, and 0 cm at 1 through 4 V (bipolar configuration). The voltage response curve for essential tremor was flatter. The monopolar configuration was 10 to 25% more effective than bipolar. The longest pulsewidth tested was up to 30% more effective than the shortest, but frequency changes had little effect on tremor amplitude. Side effects occurred only with monopolar stimulation, and the only setting that was intolerable for the majority was 4 V, 120 µs, and 185 Hz.

Conclusion: Bipolar deep brain stimulation at 90 µs, 130 Hz, adjusting the voltage up to 3 V, tends to be effective and well tolerated. Monopolar provides similar benefits for lower voltage, but side effects become common at 3 or 4 V.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. J. Birdno, S. E. Cooper, A. R. Rezai, and W. M. Grill
Pulse-to-Pulse Changes in the Frequency of Deep Brain Stimulation Affect Tremor and Modeled Neuronal Activity
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1675 - 1684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. Chen, S. E. Hua, M. A. Smith, F. A. Lenz, and R. Shadmehr
Effects of Human Cerebellar Thalamus Disruption on Adaptive Control of Reaching
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1462 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. J. Iremonger, T. R. Anderson, B. Hu, and Z. H. T. Kiss
Cellular Mechanisms Preventing Sustained Activation of Cortex During Subcortical High-Frequency Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 613 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. M. Sturman, D. E. Vaillancourt, L. V. Metman, R. A. E. Bakay, and D. M. Corcos
Effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation and medication on resting and postural tremor in Parkinson's disease
Brain, September 1, 2004; 127(9): 2131 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. C. McIntyre, W. M. Grill, D. L. Sherman, and N. V. Thakor
Cellular Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation: Model-Based Analysis of Activation and Inhibition
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1457 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.