|
|
||||||||
From the Departments of Neurology (P.E. OSuilleabhain and Dr. Dewey), Biostatistics (Dr. Frawley), and Neurosurgery (Dr. Giller), UT Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Padraig E. OSuilleabhain, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9036; e-mail: Padraig.osuilleabhain{at}UTSouthwestern.edu
Background: Thalamic deep brain stimulation ameliorates essential and parkinsonian tremors refractory to medications. Stimulus voltage, polarity configuration, frequency, and pulsewidth can each be adjusted in order to optimize tremor control and maximize battery life. The relative impacts of these programmable variables have not previously been quantified.
Methods: The thalamus of 11 patients (bilaterally in 2) was studied 4 to 59 months postoperatively. The stimulator was inactivated and medications withheld for 12 hours, and optimal electrode contacts were selected. Stimulation followed at a range of voltages (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 V), pulsewidths (60, 90, or 120 µs), and frequencies (130, 160, or 185 Hz) for both monopolar and bipolar configurations. Seventy-eight combinations of variables were programmed in random sequence. Postural and action tremors were measured with an electromagnetic tracker, tremor was subjectively graded, and side effects were noted.
Results: Voltage was consistently predictive of tremor response. Mean postural tremor amplitude in PD fell from 6.4 cm at 0 V to 2.6, 1.0, 0.3, and 0 cm at 1 through 4 V (bipolar configuration). The voltage response curve for essential tremor was flatter. The monopolar configuration was 10 to 25% more effective than bipolar. The longest pulsewidth tested was up to 30% more effective than the shortest, but frequency changes had little effect on tremor amplitude. Side effects occurred only with monopolar stimulation, and the only setting that was intolerable for the majority was 4 V, 120 µs, and 185 Hz.
Conclusion: Bipolar deep brain stimulation at 90 µs, 130 Hz, adjusting the voltage up to 3 V, tends to be effective and well tolerated. Monopolar provides similar benefits for lower voltage, but side effects become common at 3 or 4 V.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C B Maks, C R Butson, B L Walter, J L Vitek, and C C McIntyre Deep brain stimulation activation volumes and their association with neurophysiological mapping and therapeutic outcomes J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 80(6): 659 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Birdno, S. E. Cooper, A. R. Rezai, and W. M. Grill Pulse-to-Pulse Changes in the Frequency of Deep Brain Stimulation Affect Tremor and Modeled Neuronal Activity J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1675 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Chen, S. E. Hua, M. A. Smith, F. A. Lenz, and R. Shadmehr Effects of Human Cerebellar Thalamus Disruption on Adaptive Control of Reaching Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1462 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Iremonger, T. R. Anderson, B. Hu, and Z. H. T. Kiss Cellular Mechanisms Preventing Sustained Activation of Cortex During Subcortical High-Frequency Stimulation J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 613 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Sturman, D. E. Vaillancourt, L. V. Metman, R. A. E. Bakay, and D. M. Corcos Effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation and medication on resting and postural tremor in Parkinson's disease Brain, September 1, 2004; 127(9): 2131 - 2143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. McIntyre, W. M. Grill, D. L. Sherman, and N. V. Thakor Cellular Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation: Model-Based Analysis of Activation and Inhibition J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1457 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |