NEUROLOGY 2003;61:1604-1607
© 2003 American Academy of Neurology
Brief Communications
Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke
M. Ferraro, OT/R,
J. J. Palazzolo, MS,
J. Krol, OT/R,
H. I. Krebs, PhD,
N. Hogan, PhD and
B. T. Volpe, MD
From the Department of Neurology and Neuroscience (Drs. Krebs and Volpe, M. Ferraro and J. Krol), Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY; and Newman Laboratory (Drs. Krebs and Hogan, J.J. Palazzolo), Mechanical Engineering Department, and Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department (Dr. Hogan), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. B.T. Volpe, Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, 785 Mamaroneck Ave., White Plains, NY, 10605; e-mail: bvolpe{at}burke.org
Thirty patients with chronic stroke received 6 weeks of sensorimotor robotic training in a pilot study that targeted motor function of the affected shoulder and elbow. The impairment and disability scores were stable during a 2-month observation/measurement period, improved significantly by program completion, and remained robust in the 3-month follow-up. Task-specific motor training attenuated a chronic neurologic deficit well beyond the expected period for improvement after stroke.
Received April 11, 2003.
Accepted in final form August 13, 2003.
Drs. N. Hogan and H.I. Krebs are co-inventors in the MIT-held patent for the robotic device used to treat patients in this work. They hold equity positions in Interactive Motion Technologies, Inc., the company that manufactures this type of technology under license to MIT.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bosecker, L. Dipietro, B. Volpe, and H. Igo Krebs
Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2010;
24(1):
62 - 69.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Lo, P. Guarino, H. I. Krebs, B. T. Volpe, C. T. Bever, P. W. Duncan, R. J. Ringer, T. H. Wagner, L. G. Richards, D. M. Bravata, et al.
Multicenter Randomized Trial of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Methods and Entry Characteristics for VA ROBOTICS
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
October 1, 2009;
23(8):
775 - 783.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.M. Hughes, C.T. Freeman, J.H. Burridge, P.H. Chappell, P.L. Lewin, and E. Rogers
Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2009;
23(6):
559 - 568.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Cumberland Consensus Working Group, B. Cheeran, L. Cohen, B. Dobkin, G. Ford, R. Greenwood, D. Howard, M. Husain, M. Macleod, R. Nudo, et al.
The Future of Restorative Neurosciences in Stroke: Driving the Translational Research Pipeline From Basic Science to Rehabilitation of People After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
February 1, 2009;
23(2):
97 - 107.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Cordo, H. Lutsep, L. Cordo, W. G. Wright, T. Cacciatore, and R. Skoss
Assisted Movement With Enhanced Sensation (AMES): Coupling Motor and Sensory to Remediate Motor Deficits in Chronic Stroke Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
67 - 77.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rabadi, M. Galgano, D. Lynch, M Akerman, M. Lesser, and B. Volpe
A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation,
December 1, 2008;
22(12):
1071 - 1082.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. T. Volpe, D. Lynch, A. Rykman-Berland, M. Ferraro, M. Galgano, N. Hogan, and H. I. Krebs
Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 2008;
22(3):
305 - 310.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Coote, B. Murphy, W. Harwin, and E. Stokes
The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2008;
22(5):
395 - 405.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and H. I. Krebs
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
April 1, 2008;
22(2):
111 - 121.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Takahashi, L. Der-Yeghiaian, V. Le, R. R. Motiwala, and S. C. Cramer
Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke
Brain,
February 1, 2008;
131(2):
425 - 437.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Dipietro, H. I. Krebs, S. E. Fasoli, B. T. Volpe, J. Stein, C. Bever, and N. Hogan
Changing Motor Synergies in Chronic Stroke
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2007;
98(2):
757 - 768.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. C Maier and M. E Schwab
Sprouting, regeneration and circuit formation in the injured spinal cord: factors and activity
Phil Trans R Soc B,
September 29, 2006;
361(1473):
1611 - 1634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs, M. Ferraro, N. Hogan, and B. T. Volpe
Does Shorter Rehabilitation Limit Potential Recovery Poststroke?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 2004;
18(2):
88 - 94.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|