|
|
||||||||
From the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas (Drs. Frohman, Hawker, Phillips, and Racke); University of California at San Francisco (Dr. Goodin); University of Maryland (Dr. Calabresi), Baltimore; University of Colorado (Dr. Corboy), Denver; State University of New York (Dr. Coyle), Stony Brook; University of Milan (Dr. Filippi), Italy; National Institutes of Health (Dr. Frank), Bethesda, MD; University of Pennsylvania (Dr. Galetta), Philadelphia; New York University (Dr. Grossman), New York; University of Southern California (Dr. Kachuck), Los Angeles; University of Tennessee (Dr. Levin); Baylor College of Medicine (Dr. Rivera), Houston, TX; and Peachtree Neurological Clinic (Dr. Stuart), Atlanta, GA.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Elliot M. Frohman, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Department of Neurology, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75235-9036; e-mail: elliot.frohman{at}utsouthwestern.edu; or Wendy S. Edlund, Manager, Clinical Practice Guidelines, American Academy of Neurology, 1080 Montreal Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55116; e-mail: wedlund@aan.com
Advancements in imaging technologies and newly evolving treatments offer the promise of more effective management strategies for MS. Until recently, confirmation of the diagnosis of MS has generally required the demonstration of clinical activity that is disseminated in both time and space. Nevertheless, with the advent of MRI techniques, occult disease activity can be demonstrated in 50 to 80% of patients at the time of the first clinical presentation. Prospective studies have shown that the presence of such lesions predicts future conversion to clinically definite (CD) MS. Indeed, in a young to middle-aged adult with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), once alternative diagnoses are excluded at baseline, the finding of three or more white matter lesions on a T2-weighted MRI scan (especially if one of these lesions is located in the periventricular region) is a very sensitive predictor (>80%) of the subsequent development of CDMS within the next 7 to 10 years. Moreover, the presence of two or more gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions at baseline and the appearance of either new T2 lesions or new Gd enhancement on follow-up scans are also highly predictive of the subsequent development of CDMS in the near term. By contrast, normal results on MRI at the time of clinical presentation makes the future development of CDMS considerably less likely.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. K. Coyle Early treatment of multiple sclerosis to prevent neurologic damage Neurology, December 9, 2008; 71(24_suppl_3): S3 - S7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Chen, M. O. Breckwoldt, E. Aikawa, G. Chiang, and R. Weissleder Myeloperoxidase-targeted imaging of active inflammatory lesions in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Brain, April 1, 2008; 131(4): 1123 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Q. Hintzen and G. Giovannoni CSF analysis in suspected MS: Do bands aid? Neurology, March 25, 2008; 70(13_Part_2): 1059 - 1060. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Davis, T. C. Frohman, C. G. Crandall, M. J. Brown, D. A. Mills, P. D. Kramer, O. Stuve, and E. M. Frohman Modeling Uhthoff's phenomenon in MS patients with internuclear ophthalmoparesis Neurology, March 25, 2008; 70(13_Part_2): 1098 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kappos, C. H. Polman, M. S. Freedman, G. Edan, H. P. Hartung, D. H. Miller, X. Montalban, F. Barkhof, L. Bauer, P. Jakobs, et al. Treatment with interferon beta-1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1242 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tintore, A. Rovira, J. Rio, C. Nos, E. Grive, N. Tellez, R. Pelayo, M. Comabella, J. Sastre-Garriga, and X. Montalban Baseline MRI predicts future attacks and disability in clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology, September 26, 2006; 67(6): 968 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.P. Wattjes, M. Harzheim, C.K. Kuhl, J. Gieseke, S. Schmidt, L. Klotz, T. Klockgether, H.H. Schild, and G.G. Lutterbey Does High-field MR Imaging Have an Influence on the Classification of Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndromes According to Current Diagnostic MR Imaging Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1794 - 1798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Mikaeloff, G. Caridade, S. Assi, S. Suissa, M. Tardieu, and on behalf of the KIDSEP Study Group Prognostic Factors for Early Severity in a Childhood Multiple Sclerosis Cohort Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): 1133 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Fraser, A. Klistorner, S. Graham, R. Garrick, F. Billson, and J. Grigg Multifocal visual evoked potential latency analysis: predicting progression to multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol, June 1, 2006; 63(6): 847 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Inglese Multiple sclerosis: new insights and trends. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 954 - 957. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Whiting, R. Harbord, C. Main, J. J Deeks, G. Filippini, M. Egger, and J. A C Sterne Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: systematic review BMJ, April 15, 2006; 332(7546): 875 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Frohman, E. Havrdova, F. Lublin, F. Barkhof, A. Achiron, M. K. Sharief, O. Stuve, M. K. Racke, L. Steinman, H. Weiner, et al. Most patients with multiple sclerosis or a clinically isolated demyelinating syndrome should be treated at the time of diagnosis. Arch Neurol, April 1, 2006; 63(4): 614 - 619. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T J Murray Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis. BMJ, March 4, 2006; 332(7540): 525 - 527. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Frohman, M. K. Racke, and C. S. Raine Multiple sclerosis--the plaque and its pathogenesis. N. Engl. J. Med., March 2, 2006; 354(9): 942 - 955. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.H. Simon, D. Li, A. Traboulsee, P.K. Coyle, D.L. Arnold, F. Barkhof, J.A. Frank, R. Grossman, D.W. Paty, E.W. Radue, et al. Standardized MR Imaging Protocol for Multiple Sclerosis: Consortium of MS Centers Consensus Guidelines. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 455 - 461. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Frohman, O. Stuve, E. Havrdova, J. Corboy, A. Achiron, R. Zivadinov, P. S. Sorensen, J. T. Phillips, B. Weinshenker, K. Hawker, et al. Therapeutic Considerations for Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence, Experience, and Future Expectations Arch Neurol, October 1, 2005; 62(10): 1519 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I F Pestalozza, C Pozzilli, S Di Legge, M C Piattella, P Pantano, F Caramia, P Pasqualetti, and G L Lenzi Monthly brain magnetic resonance imaging scans in patients with clinically isolated syndrome Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2005; 11(4): 390 - 394. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Goldberg-Zimring, B. Shalmon, K. H. Zou, H. Azhari, D. Nass, and A. Achiron Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions with Spherical Harmonics: Comparison of MR Imaging and Pathologic Findings Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 1036 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Keane Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia: Unusual Causes in 114 of 410 Patients Arch Neurol, May 1, 2005; 62(5): 714 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Carmosino, K. M. Brousseau, D. B. Arciniegas, and J. R. Corboy Initial Evaluations for Multiple Sclerosis in a University Multiple Sclerosis Center: Outcomes and Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Referral Arch Neurol, April 1, 2005; 62(4): 585 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H Polman, J. S Wolinsky, and S. C Reingold Multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: three years later Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2005; 11(1): 5 - 12. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bergamaschi and A. Pichiecchio Letter to the editor Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2005; 11(1): 93 - 93. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Samuels Update in Neurology Ann Intern Med, January 4, 2005; 142(1): 28 - 36. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bakshi, G. J. Hutton, J. R. Miller, and E.-W. Radue The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and long-term management of multiple sclerosis Neurology, December 14, 2004; 63(11_suppl_5): S3 - S11. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Optic Neuritis Study Group Long-term Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes After Optic Neuritis in Patients Without Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis Arch Neurol, October 1, 2004; 61(10): 1538 - 1541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. J. Uitdehaag, J. J. G. Geurts, F. Barkhof, C. H. Polman, D. S. Goodin, and E. M. Frohman The utility of MRI in suspected MS: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee Neurology, September 28, 2004; 63(6): 1140 - 1140. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Optic Neuritis Study Group Neurologic Impairment 10 Years After Optic Neuritis Arch Neurol, September 1, 2004; 61(9): 1386 - 1389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Mikaeloff, C. Adamsbaum, B. Husson, L. Vallee, G. Ponsot, C. Confavreux, M. Tardieu, S. Suissa, and the KIDMUS Study Group on Radiology MRI prognostic factors for relapse after acute CNS inflammatory demyelination in childhood Brain, September 1, 2004; 127(9): 1942 - 1947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Gordon and E. M. Frohman The utility of MRI in suspected MS: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee Neurology, March 9, 2004; 62(5): 838 - 838. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
How Does MRI Fit into the MS Diagnostic Picture? Journal Watch Neurology, December 12, 2003; 2003(1212): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Simon and A. J. Thompson Is multiple sclerosis still a clinical diagnosis? Neurology, September 9, 2003; 61(5): 596 - 597. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all Correspondence
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |