Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by German Stroke Study Collaboration,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by German Stroke Study Collaboration,
Related Collections
Right arrow All Cerebrovascular disease/Stroke
Right arrow Infarction
Right arrow Prognosis
NEUROLOGY 2004;62:581-585
© 2004 American Academy of Neurology

Predicting outcome after acute ischemic stroke

An external validation of prognostic models

German Stroke Study Collaboration*

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. C. Weimar, Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany; e-mail: stroke.med{at}uni-essen.de

Objective: To externally validate two prognostic models predicting functional outcome and survival 100 days after acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: Using prospectively collected data from 1,470 patients, the authors evaluated two previously developed models. Model I predicts incomplete functional recovery (Barthel Index <95) vs complete functional recovery with 11 variables, whereas model II predicts mortality vs survival with 3 variables. On admission to a participating hospital, patients were registered prospectively and included according to defined criteria. Within 72 hours, predictive variables under investigation were assessed. Follow-up was performed 100 days after the event.

Results: Model I correctly predicted 68.1% of the patients who had incompletely recovered or had died and 85.7% of the completely recovered patients, model II 46.9% of the patients who had died and 95.9% of the surviving patients. Both models performed better than the treating physicians’ predictions made within 72 hours after admission.

Conclusion: The resulting prognostic models are useful to correctly stratify treatment groups in clinical trials and to accurately predict the distribution of endpoint variables.


Received June 19, 2003. Accepted in final form October 19, 2003.

*See the Appendix on page 585 for a list of Group members.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
I. R. Konig, A. Ziegler, E. Bluhmki, W. Hacke, P. M.W. Bath, R. L. Sacco, H. C. Diener, C. Weimar, and on behalf of the Virtual International Stroke Tria
Predicting Long-Term Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Simple Index Works in Patients From Controlled Clinical Trials
Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1821 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
C. Weimar, M. Goertler, L. Harms, H.-C. Diener, and for the German Stroke Study Collaboration
Distribution and outcome of symptomatic stenoses and occlusions in patients with acute cerebral ischemia.
Arch Neurol, September 1, 2006; 63(9): 1287 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
C Weimar, J Benemann, H-C Diener, and for the German Stroke Study Collaboration
Development and validation of the Essen Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 77(5): 601 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Chamorro, J.P. Horcajada, V. Obach, M. Vargas, M. Revilla, F. Torres, A. Cervera, A.M. Planas, and J. Mensa
The Early Systemic Prophylaxis of Infection After Stroke Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1495 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. M.S. Nys, M. J.E. van Zandvoort, P. L.M. de Kort, H. B. van der Worp, B. P.W. Jansen, A. Algra, E. H.F. de Haan, and L. J. Kappelle
The prognostic value of domain-specific cognitive abilities in acute first-ever stroke
Neurology, March 8, 2005; 64(5): 821 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
C. Weimar, T. Mieck, J. Buchthal, C. E. Ehrenfeld, E. Schmid, H.-C. Diener, and for the German Stroke Study Collaboration
Neurologic Worsening During the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke
Arch Neurol, March 1, 2005; 62(3): 393 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other articles noted: 06 Feb 2004 to 16 Apr 2004
Evid. Based Nurs., July 1, 2004; 7(3): e3 - e3.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.