|
|
||||||||
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. C. Weimar, Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany; e-mail: stroke.med{at}uni-essen.de
Objective: To externally validate two prognostic models predicting functional outcome and survival 100 days after acute ischemic stroke.
Methods: Using prospectively collected data from 1,470 patients, the authors evaluated two previously developed models. Model I predicts incomplete functional recovery (Barthel Index <95) vs complete functional recovery with 11 variables, whereas model II predicts mortality vs survival with 3 variables. On admission to a participating hospital, patients were registered prospectively and included according to defined criteria. Within 72 hours, predictive variables under investigation were assessed. Follow-up was performed 100 days after the event.
Results: Model I correctly predicted 68.1% of the patients who had incompletely recovered or had died and 85.7% of the completely recovered patients, model II 46.9% of the patients who had died and 95.9% of the surviving patients. Both models performed better than the treating physicians predictions made within 72 hours after admission.
Conclusion: The resulting prognostic models are useful to correctly stratify treatment groups in clinical trials and to accurately predict the distribution of endpoint variables.
Received June 19, 2003. Accepted in final form October 19, 2003.
*See the Appendix on page 585 for a list of Group members.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Saini, M. Saqqur, A. Kamruzzaman, K. R. Lees, A. Shuaib, and on behalf of the VISTA Investigators Effect of Hyperthermia on Prognosis After Acute Ischemic Stroke * Supplemental References Stroke, September 1, 2009; 40(9): 3051 - 3059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H F Lingsma, D W J Dippel, S E Hoeks, E W Steyerberg, C L Franke, R J van Oostenbrugge, G de Jong, M L Simoons, W J M Scholte op Reimer, and The Netherlands Stroke Survey investigators Variation between hospitals in patient outcome after stroke is only partly explained by differences in quality of care: results from the Netherlands Stroke Survey J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 79(8): 888 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R. Konig, A. Ziegler, E. Bluhmki, W. Hacke, P. M.W. Bath, R. L. Sacco, H. C. Diener, C. Weimar, and on behalf of the Virtual International Stroke Tria Predicting Long-Term Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Simple Index Works in Patients From Controlled Clinical Trials Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1821 - 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Weimar, M. Goertler, L. Harms, H.-C. Diener, and for the German Stroke Study Collaboration Distribution and outcome of symptomatic stenoses and occlusions in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Arch Neurol, September 1, 2006; 63(9): 1287 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Weimar, J Benemann, H-C Diener, and for the German Stroke Study Collaboration Development and validation of the Essen Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 77(5): 601 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chamorro, J.P. Horcajada, V. Obach, M. Vargas, M. Revilla, F. Torres, A. Cervera, A.M. Planas, and J. Mensa The Early Systemic Prophylaxis of Infection After Stroke Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1495 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M.S. Nys, M. J.E. van Zandvoort, P. L.M. de Kort, H. B. van der Worp, B. P.W. Jansen, A. Algra, E. H.F. de Haan, and L. J. Kappelle The prognostic value of domain-specific cognitive abilities in acute first-ever stroke Neurology, March 8, 2005; 64(5): 821 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Weimar, T. Mieck, J. Buchthal, C. E. Ehrenfeld, E. Schmid, H.-C. Diener, and for the German Stroke Study Collaboration Neurologic Worsening During the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke Arch Neurol, March 1, 2005; 62(3): 393 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Other articles noted: 06 Feb 2004 to 16 Apr 2004 Evid. Based Nurs., July 1, 2004; 7(3): e3 - e3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |