|
|
||||||||
From the Departments of Neurology (Drs. Georgiadis, Oehler, Schwarz, and Schwab) and Neuroradiology (Dr. Hartmann), University of Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Biostatistics (Dr. Rousson), University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. D. Georgiadis, Department of Neurology, University of Zürich, Frauenklinikstr. 26, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland; e-mail: Dimitrios.Georgiadis{at}usz.ch
Objective: To evaluate the prognosis of patients with acute occlusion of the carotid T.
Methods: The authors studied 42 consecutive patients with acute carotid T occlusion, age 66 (59 to 74) years (median [interquartile range]). T occlusion was diagnosed with transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD; n = 11) and MR (n = 28) or CT (n = 3) angiography. Final infarction size was evaluated on follow-up CT 3 to 7 days after symptom onset and recanalization by follow-up TCD 24 to 36 hours after symptom onset.
Results: NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission was 18 (16 to 20). Final infarct size was one-third or less of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory in 11, greater than one-third but less than or equal to two-thirds of the MCA territory in 10, and greater than two-thirds of the MCA territory in 21 patients. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 6 months after stroke onset was 2 in 7 (17%), 3 in 2 (5%), 4 in 13 (31%), 5 in 7 (17%), and 6 in 13 (31%) patients. Complete or partial MCA recanalization within 24 hours after symptom onset was observed in 12 of 18 patients treated with thrombolysis and 4 of the remaining 24 patients (p = 0.001) and was associated with better clinical outcome (mRS 2, recanalization 6/7 [86%]; mRS 3 to 5, recanalization 8/22 [36%]; mRS 6, recanalization 2/13 [15%]; p = 0.01). Recanalization and NIHSS score on admission were independent predictors of outcome.
Conclusions: Acute carotid T occlusion does not necessarily carry a poor prognosis. IV thrombolysis frequently results in recanalization, which is related to a better clinical outcome and smaller final infarction size.
Received March 10, 2003. Accepted in final form March 1, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ciccone, L. Valvassori, R. Gasparotti, F. Scomazzoni, E. Ballabio, and R. Sterzi Debunking 7 Myths That Hamper the Realization of Randomized Controlled Trials on Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2191 - 2195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Flint, G. R. Duckwiler, R. F. Budzik, D. S. Liebeskind, W. S. Smith, and for the MERCI and Multi MERCI Writing Committee Mechanical Thrombectomy of Intracranial Internal Carotid Occlusion: Pooled Results of the MERCI and Multi MERCI Part I Trials Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1274 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zangerle, S. Kiechl, M. Spiegel, M. Furtner, M. Knoflach, P. Werner, A. Mair, G. Wille, C. Schmidauer, K. Gautsch, et al. Recanalization after thrombolysis in stroke patients: Predictors and prognostic implications Neurology, January 2, 2007; 68(1): 39 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Smith, G. Sung, S. Starkman, J. L. Saver, C. S. Kidwell, Y.P. Gobin, H. L. Lutsep, G. M. Nesbit, T. Grobelny, M. M. Rymer, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Embolectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results of the MERCI Trial Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1432 - 1438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Samson, S. Crozier, S. Deltour, M. Obadia, M. Bruandet, A. Leger, D. Georgiadis, S. Schwarz, and S. Schwab Does acute occlusion of the carotid T invariably have a poor outcome? Neurology, May 10, 2005; 64(9): 1664 - 1664. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all Correspondence
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |