HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mark, V. W. Articles by Mennemeier, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mark, V. W. Articles by Mennemeier, M. Related Collections All Cerebrovascular disease/Stroke Neglect Infarction

Disorganized search on cancellation is not a consequence of neglect

From the Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Drs. Mark and Mennemeier and A.J. Woods), Psychology (Dr. Ball), and Biostatistics (Dr. Roth), University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Victor W. Mark, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19^th Street South, SRC 190, Birmingham, AL 35249-7330; e-mail: vwmark{at}uab.edu

Background: Some studies have suggested that in stroke patients, spatial inattention on the cancellation test is closely related to disorganized visual search. However, methods to assess spatial aspects of search organization on cancellation tests have not been well developed. In this study the authors design and evaluate new methods to quantify strategies of spatial exploration on the cancellation test in stroke patients who showed a broad range of spatial attentional abilities, and test whether disorganization and inattention are related.

Methods: Twenty stroke patients were videotaped while they performed a cancellation test. Several variables that reflect spatial aspects of search organization were measured through subsequent video playback. Two patients with severe neglect were excluded from further analysis to avoid constraining the spatial expression of search organization. Spearman correlations were used to assess whether severity of spatial inattention correlated with the individual search organization measures.

Results: Of the 18 remaining patients, 10 had mild-moderate spatial neglect (pathologic inattention), while the other 8 omitted at most one target (normal performance). There were no significant correlations between the number of targets omitted and any of the search organization measures.

Conclusions: Spatial inattention on cancellation due to neglect following stroke is not closely related to the organization of visual search. Instead, search disorganization during cancellation may reflect disturbance of an unspecified executive control mechanism.

Received August 20, 2003. Accepted in final form February 17, 2004.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.-C. HUANG and T.-Y. WANG Visualized representation of visual search patterns for a visuospatial attention test Behav Res Methods, May 1, 2008; 40(2): 383 - 390. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. M. S. Nys, M. J. E. v. Zandvoort, H. B. v. d. Worp, L. J. Kappelle, and E. H. F. d. Haan Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical correlates of perseverative responses in subacute stroke. Brain, August 1, 2006; 129(Pt 8): 2148 - 2157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]