HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goldenberg, G. Articles by Hermsdörfer, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goldenberg, G. Articles by Hermsdörfer, J. Related Collections All Neuropsychology/Behavior Apraxia

The effect of tactile feedback on pantomime of tool use in apraxia

From the Neuropsychological Department, Krankenhaus München Bogenhausen, Germany.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Georg Goldenberg, Neuropsychological Department, Krankenhaus München Bogenhausen, Englschalkingerstrasse 77, D 81925 München, Germany; e-mail: Georg.Goldenberg{at}extern.lrz-muenchen.de

Objective: To investigate whether apraxic patients’ better performance with real tools compared to miming is due to the tactile feedback provided by holding the tool.

Methods: Ten patients with aphasia and apraxia from left hemisphere damage were asked to demonstrate the use of 12 tools and objects under three conditions: miming with empty hands, miming with an implement shaped like the handle of the tool, and using the real tool with its corresponding object.

Results: Whereas real tool use was much better than pantomime in all patients, tactile feedback from the isolated handle facilitated miming only in some and deteriorated it in others so that across the group there was no significant improvement.

Conclusions: The better performance of real than of pretended tool use does not depend on tactile feedback per se, but on the mechanical affordances and constraints of tools and objects transmitted by this feedback in real use. Tactile feedback deprived of these contents and restricted to the shape of the handle does not substantially help produce the appropriate action.

Received March 29, 2004. Accepted in final form July 12, 2004.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Bohlhalter, N. Hattori, L. Wheaton, E. Fridman, E. A. Shamim, G. Garraux, and M. Hallett Gesture Subtype-Dependent Left Lateralization of Praxis Planning: An Event-Related fMRI Study Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2009; 19(6): 1256 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Kroliczak and S. H. Frey A Common Network in the Left Cerebral Hemisphere Represents Planning of Tool Use Pantomimes and Familiar Intransitive Gestures at the Hand-Independent Level Cereb Cortex, January 30, 2009; (2009) bhn261v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Weiss, N. N. Rahbari, M. D. Hesse, and G. R. Fink Deficient sequencing of pantomimes in apraxia Neurology, March 11, 2008; 70(11): 834 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Goldenberg, J. Hermsdorfer, R. Glindemann, C. Rorden, and H.-O. Karnath Pantomime of Tool Use Depends on Integrity of Left Inferior Frontal Cortex Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2007; 17(12): 2769 - 2776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]