|
|
||||||||
| Neurology supplements are not peer-reviewed. Information contained in Neurology supplements represent the opinions of the authors and are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views of the American Academy of Neurology, Editor-in-Chief, or Associate Editors of Neurology. |
From the Multiple Sclerosis Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr. Vartanian), the Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California (Dr. Zamvil), the MS Clinic of Central Texas, Round Rock, Texas (Dr. Fox), and the MS Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Rigshopitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (Dr. Sorensen).
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Timothy K. Vartanian, Boston Director, Center for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail: tvartani{at}bidmc.harvard.edu
Protein- and peptide-based disease-modifying agents for multiple sclerosis (MS), including interferon beta (IFNß) and glatiramer acetate (GA), have been associated with the formation of antibodies. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) block or neutralize the biological effects of the protein or polypeptide, potentially decreasing the therapeutic effects of these agents. Although the clinical relevance of antibodies against GA requires further investigation; both the incidence of NAbs to the three IFNß products (IFNß1bBetaseron, IFNß1aRebif, and IFNß1aAvonex) and the clinical relevance are quite clear. Data from clinical trials of IFNß products show that the immunogenicity of Betaseron > Rebif > Avonex and persistent NAbs reduce the clinical efficacy of IFNß. Because the initial detection of NAbs in the serum of patients receiving IFNß usually occurs between 6 and 15 months and appears to precede any apparent reduction in clinical efficacy by approximately 6 to 12 months, trials with a duration of less than 3 years are problematic when the clinical impact of NAbs is assessed. The potential development of NAbs is an important consideration in selection and monitoring treatment of MS. Long-term prospective studies are needed to further define the clinical effects of NAbs on patients receiving disease-modifying therapies for MS.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Mastronardi, H. Tsui, S. Winer, D. Wood, T. Selvanantham, C. Galligan, E. Fish, H-M. Dosch, and M. Moscarello Synergy between paclitaxel plus an exogenous methyl donor in the suppression of murine demyelinating diseases Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2007; 13(5): 596 - 609. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Hoffmann, M. Krumbholz, H. Faber, T. Kuempfel, M. Starck, W. Pollmann, E. Meinl, and R. Hohlfeld Multiple sclerosis: Relating MxA transcription to anti-interferon-{beta}-neutralizing antibodies Neurology, March 20, 2007; 68(12): 958 - 959. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |