Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Neurology
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipton, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mauskop, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipton, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Mauskop, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow All Clinical trials
Right arrow Clinical trials Randomized controlled (CONSORT agreement)
Right arrow Migraine
NEUROLOGY 2004;63:2240-2244
© 2004 American Academy of Neurology

Petasites hybridus root (butterbur) is an effective preventive treatment for migraine

R. B. Lipton, MD, H. Göbel, MD, PhD, K. M. Einhäupl, MD, K. Wilks, MD and A. Mauskop, MD

From the Departments of Neurology and Epidemiology and Population Health (Dr. Lipton), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, and New York Headache Center (Dr. Mauskop), New York, NY, and Innovative Medical Research, a Division of Advance PCS, Baltimore, MD; and Pain Clinic and Christian Albrechts University Kiel (Dr. Göbel) and Charite (Dr. Einhäupl), Department of Neurology, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. R.B. Lipton, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1165 Morris Park Ave., Rousso Bldg., Rm. 332, Bronx, NY 10461; e-mail: rlipton{at}aecom.yu.edu

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a standardized special root extract from the plant Petasites hybridus as a preventive therapy for migraine.

Methods: This is a three-arm, parallel-group, randomized trial comparing Petasites extract 75 mg bid, Petasites extract 50 mg bid, or placebo bid in 245 patients with migraine. Eligible patients met International Headache Society criteria for migraine, were ages 18 to 65, and had at least two to six attacks per month over the preceding 3 months. The main outcome measure was the decrease in migraine attack frequency per month calculated as percentage change from baseline over a 4-month treatment period.

Results: Over 4 months of treatment, in the per-protocol analysis, migraine attack frequency was reduced by 48% for Petasites extract 75 mg bid (p = 0.0012 vs placebo), 36% for Petasites extract 50 mg bid (p = 0.127 vs placebo), and 26% for the placebo group. The proportion of patients with a ≥50% reduction in attack frequency after 4 months was 68% for patients in the Petasites extract 75-mg arm and 49% for the placebo arm (p < 0.05). Results were also significant in favor of Petasites 75 mg at 1, 2, and 3 months based on this endpoint. The most frequently reported adverse reactions considered possibly related to treatment were mild gastrointestinal events, predominantly burping.

Conclusions: Petasites extract 75 mg bid is more effective than placebo and is well tolerated as a preventive therapy for migraine. Petasites 50 mg PO bid was not significantly more effective than placebo on the primary study endpoints.


Received December 4, 2003. Accepted in final form August 2, 2004.

Additional material related to this article can be found on the Neurology Web site. Go to www.neurology.org and scroll down the Table of Contents for the December 28 issue to find the title link for this article.

Drs. Lipton and Göbel are consultants for Weber & Weber GmbH & Co. KG, Biologische Arzneimittel, Germany, and have received honoraria under $10,000.


Related articles in Neurology:

December 28 Highlights

Neurology 2004 63: 2202-2003. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
A. Pakalnis
Current Therapies in Childhood and Adolescent Migraine
J Child Neurol, November 1, 2007; 22(11): 1288 - 1292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PNHome page
D W Dodick and S D Silberstein
Migraine prevention
Practical Neurology, November 1, 2007; 7(6): 383 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
T. Tucker
A Practical Approach to Headache Treatment
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, April 1, 2007; 20(2): 123 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
R. Lehman
Evidently...
Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2005; 10(4): 105 - 105.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med., August 1, 2005; 10(4): 127 - 128.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
A. Schapowal
Addressing the Long-term Safety Aspects of Butterbur Therapy: A Call for Immediate Action--Reply
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, June 1, 2005; 131(6): 540 - 540.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Butterbur to Prevent Migraines
Journal Watch (General), January 14, 2005; 2005(114): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.